DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.1901.16
UDC: 
37.013.77
Aleksandrova Natalia Alekseevna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Information Systems and Technologies in Education, Saratov State University, aleksandrovan@bk.ru, Saratov
Chernyaeva Tatiana Nikolaevna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Pedagogical Psychology and Psychodiagnostics, Saratov State University, cherniaeva@inbox.ru, Saratov

STUDY ATTENTION OF STUDENTS IN A SITUATION OF INFORMATION-A TECHNOLOGICAL BREAKTHROUGH IN EDUCATION

Abstract: 
The article deals with the modern aspects of attention as the most important cognitive process; the problems associated with the impact of the information technology revolution on attention; the possibilities of using the latest interdisciplinary achievements in the study of concentration and stability of arbitrary attention; the possibilities of using the interface “brain  – computer” and robots-assistants Android type in education to identify, systematize cognitive patterns as psychological characteristics of attention at the stage of primary education in order to study, mobilize attention. The article is aimed at finding ways to solve the urgent problem of identifying, systematizing the features of attention for the subsequent development of specific methods of management of their cognitive activity, including through the involvement of the neural interface “brain-computer». Methodology. The theoretical basis of the study addressed research in the field of neuropsychology (Luria, Y. M. Mikadze, L. Y. Moscovice, E. D. Chomsky, L. S. Tsvetkova), neuropathologic (T. V. Akhutina, D. V. Eremeev, V. A. Moskvin, N. V. Moskvina, T. P. Chrisman), neurodidactics (the term G. Price; study O. V. Kulikova, K. A. Morova, A. S. Potapov, O. L. Podlivaev, A. L. Sirotyuk). Also analyzed work related to the study of neural interfaces “brain – computer” (G. V. Osipov, V. I. Nekorkin, A. N. Pisarchik A. Y. Kaplan, M. X. Cohen, M. Siegel, J. R. Wolpaw), technology for the use of special electronic devices allowing a person based on the registration of EEG signals to communicate with an external device (a computer, an exoskeleton robot) (A. M. Ivanitsky, A. E. Osadchy, A. A. Frolov, and A. E. Hramov, L. K. McEvoy, C. S. Herrmann, G. Buzsaki). The article concludes that it is possible to use brain – computer neurointerface not only in the study of the dynamics of concentration at a new technical level on the basis of deciphering the patterns of neural activity of the brain, but also its use by the teacher to build a system of interactive differentiated and individualized learning, taking into account the neuropsychological characteristics of students.
Keywords: 
attention, neuropedagogy, the method of biological feedback, robotic device, neurointerface
Please register
References: 

1. Azaryonok, N. V., 2009. Clip consciousness and its influence on human psychology in the modern world: Materials of the all-Russian anniversary scientific conference dedicated to the 120th anniversary of S. L. Rubinstein’s birth “human Psychology in the modern world”. Volume 5. The individual and the group in terms of social change. Moscow: Institute of psychology RAS Publ., pp. 110–112. (In Russ.)
2. Gaykhman, L. K., 2013. The crisis of the pedagogical interaction: digital “natives” vs digital “immigrants”. In: New technologies in the educational space of native and foreign languages: materials V international. scientific.-prakt. Conf. Perm: Perm national research Polytechnic University Publ., pp. 302–309. (In Russ.)
3. Erosiva, O. V., 2009. The role of attention in the development of cognitive processes. Research in education, No 1. [online]. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13082594 (accessed: 10.09.2018). (In Russ.)
4. Health in Russia: Stat.SB. Moscow: Statistics of Russia Publ., 2017. 170 p. (In Russ.)
5. Kudinova, E. B., 2017. Influence of gadgets on modern schoolchildren. Young scientist, 16, pp. 464–465. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Lisicanova, S. A., 2012. Influence of features of modern school students on their cognitive motivation. Young scientist, 4, pp. 428–431. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Hramov, А. Е., Maksimenko, V. A., Pchelintseva, S. V., Runnova, A. E., Grubov, V. Yu., Musatov, V. Yu., Zhuravlev, M. O., Koronovskii, A. A., Pisarchik, A. N., 2017. Methods of diagnosis of neural network States in the perception of visual stimuli and cognitive activity with the help of the apparatus of artificial intelligence (Classifying the perceptual interpretations of a bistable image using EEG and artificial neural networks). Frontiers in neuro science, 11, 674, pp. 1–18. (In Russ.)
8. Maximenko, V. A., Runnova, A. E., Zhuravlev, M. O., Makarov, V. V., Nedayvozov, V. O., Grubov, V. V., Pchelintceva, S. V., Hramov, A. E., Pisarchik, A. N., 2017. The method of estimating the degree of concentration on EEG signals (signals of neural activity) and its control through bio-feedback (Visual perception affected by motivation and alertness controlled by in noninvasive brain-computer interface). PLOS ONE, 12 (12): e0188700. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188700. (In Russ.)
9. The General questions of application of the method of biofeedback. Saint Petersburg: CJSC Biosvyaz Publ., 2008, 81 p. (In Russ.)
10. Podlivaev, O. L., Morrow, K. A., 2015. Actual problems of neuropathologica. Bulletin of Kemerovo state University, No 3 (63), Vol. 1, pp. 126–129. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Prensky Mark. Aborigines and immigrants of the digital world. [online]. Available at: http http: //www.gimc.EN/content/statya-marka-prenski-aboriginal-i-immigration-cifrov... (accessed: 16.11.2018). (In Russ.)
12. Statistics of autism in the world. [online]. Available at: https://vawilon.ru/statistika-autizma-v-mire (accessed: 16.09.2018). (In Russ.)
13. Strakhov, V. I., 1974. Psychological research of attention. Questions of psychology of attention. Vol. VI. Saratov: Saratov state pedagogical University Publ., pp. 35–42. (In Russ.)
14. Strakhov, I. V., 1976. On the psychological structure of attention. Questions of psychology, Vol. VIII. Saratov: Saratov state pedagogical University Publ., pp. 95–98. (In Russ.)
15. Tarasov, S. V., 2000. Schoolboy in the modern educational environment. Monograph. St. Petersburg: Education-culture Publ., 144 p. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. On national security Strategy of the Russian Federation. The decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 31, 2015 N 683. [online]. Available at: http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/71296054/paragraph/1:2 (accessed: 09.11.2018). (In Russ.)
17. Ukhtomsky, A. A., 2012. Selected works. Moscow: book on Demand Publ., 369 p. (In Russ.)
18. On education in the Russian Federation. Federal law of 29.12.2012 N 273-FZ. [online]. Available at: http http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/ (accessed: 09.11.2018). (In Russ.)
19. Feldstein, D. I., 2009. Features of modern childhood and the problem of theoretical and methodological support of the process of education. Pedagogy, No 1, pp. 8–15. (In Russ.)
20. Shalagina, E. V., 2014. On the new cognitive reality. Bulletin of social and humanitarian education and science, No 2, pp. 37–41. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
21. Hook, C. J., Farah, M. J., 2013. Neuroscience for Educators: What are They Seeking, and What are They Finding?. Neuroethics, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 331–341. (In Eng.)