DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2105.05
UDC: 
378.637:51
Dulatova Zainep Asanalievna
Кандидат физико-математических наук, Cand. Sci. (Physico-mathemat.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Mathematics and Method of Teaching Mathematics, Irkutsk State University, dulatova@yandex.ru, Irkutsk
Kovyrshina Anna Ivanovna
Кандидат физико-математических наук, Cand. Sci. (Physico-mathemat.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Mathematics and Method of Teaching Mathematics, Irkutsk State University, annkow@mail.ru, Irkutsk
Lapshina Elena Sergeevna
Кандидат физико-математических наук, Cand. Sci. (Physical and mathematical), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of mathematics and method of teaching mathematics, Irkutsk State University, esl7828@gmail.com, Irkutsk
Shtykov Nikolay Nikolaevich
Кандидат физико-математических наук, Cand. Sci. (Physico-mathematical), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Social and Economic Disciplines, Irkutsk State University, tukubik8@gmail.com, Irkutsk

The Instuments for the Development of Universal Logical Skills of Analysis and the Culture of the Transmission of These Skills in the Process of Professional Training of Mathimatics Teachers

Abstract: 
General logical universal learning activities (analysis, synthesis, comparison, etc.) in studies of the theory of development of universal learning activities are often represented by generalized formulations such as «text analysis», «analysis of the formulation of a theorem», «synthesis of information», etc. This approach does not allow to evaluate the level of complexity of a cognitive action, to determine its specificity, and to distinguish the levels of possession of this cognitive action. The article deals with the approach to forming the general logical action of analysis, which is based on the concept of funding, developed by E.I. Smirnov, V.D. Shadrikov. The methodological principle of the research is associated with various aspects of the system-activity and competence-based approaches to the organization of teaching students of pedagogical specialties. The aim of the article is to develop an approach to the design of teaching tools aimed at the formation of the general logical action of analysis. Results. The article describes the preparatory stage of the implementation of the concept of funding general logical cognitive actions in the training of students of pedagogical direction. The approach to the level differentiation of cognitive action of analysis is proposed. The types of analysis and their manifestations in mathematical and socio-humanitarian disciplines are considered. In conclusion, the necessity of differentiating the analysis in the organization of funding of this action is justified.
Keywords: 
logical universal learning activities, general logical activities, analysis, synthesis, the concept of in education
Please register
References: 

1. Asmolov, A. G., Burmenskaya, G. V., Volodarskaya, I. A., 2008. How to design universal learning activities in elementary school: from action to thought: Teacher’s manual. Moscow: Prosveschenie Publ., 151 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bozhenkova, L. I., 2013. The method of formation of universal educational activities in teaching geometry. Moscow: BINOM. Lab Knowledge, 205 p. (In Russ.).
3. Dulatova, Z. A., Kovyrshina, A. I., Lapshina, E. S., Shtykov, N. N., 2019. The conception of foundation in the formation, development and assessment of logical universal learning activities. Proceedings of the 6th International School-Seminar. Mongolia, Khanh: Irkutsk State University, pp. 39–42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Dulatova, Z. A., Kovyrshina, A. I., Lapshina, E. S., Shtykov, N. N., 2019. Formation, development and evaluation of logical universal educational actions. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no. 6, pp. 33–42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Dulatova, Z. A., Kovyrshina, A. I., Lapshina, E. S., Shtykov, N. N., 2020. Forming of translation culture of cognitive logical universal learning activities in the process of training teachers. Proceedings of VI International forum on teacher education. Part IV. Kazan: Kazan Federal University, pp. 305–308. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Levin, G. D., 2020. Classical theory of analysis and synthesis. Philosophy of science and technology, no. 2, pp. 103–115. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Shkerina, L. V., Keiv, M. A., Berseneva, O. V., Zhuravleva, N. A., 2018. Monitoring of the level of formation of metasubject results of teaching mathematics in 5 grades: study guide [online]. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35463368 (accessed 23.08.2021). (In Russ.)
8. Shadrikov, V. D., ed., 2002. Mathematics teacher training: Innovative approaches: study guide. Moscow: Gardariki Publ., 524 p. (In Russ.)
9. Ardeleanu, R., 2019. Traditional and Modern Teaching Methods in Mathematics. Journal of Innovation in Psychology, Education and Didactics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 133–140. (In Eng.)
10. Aristidou, M., 2020. Is Mathematical Logic Really Necessary in Teaching Mathematical Proofs? Athens Journal of Education, vol. 7, Iss. 1, pp. 99–122. (In Eng.)