DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2106.01
UDC: 
378+13
Bocharova Julia Yurevna
Кандидат педагогических наук, associate professor, assistant professor of Department of social pedagogy and social work, Krasnoyarsk state pedagogical University. B. N. Astaf'eva, bocharova1305@kspu.ru, Krasnoyarsk

The Missions of the Regional Pedagogical University: Post-Non-Classical Understanding

Abstract: 
Pedagogical universities are in the area of great attention from the society and the state because of their increasing role in forming the human capital of the territories. The purpose of this article is to explain the necessity and possibility of creating a mission and strategy for the development of pedagogical universities in (macro) regions on the basis of a post-non-classical understanding of pedagogical education. Methodology and methods: to construct the mission of the pedagogical university, claiming to play an active role in the ecosystem of education in the region, the post-non-classical methodology was used in understanding pedagogical education as an open, system-synergetic approach (ecosystem as its kind), as well as the typical of the post-non-classical methodology, methods of reconstructing the experience of designing an open pedagogical education in a heterogeneous (academic and teaching) professional community. Research results: three missions of the regional pedagogical university are characterized: education, research and impact on society, from the standpoint of the ecosystem approach and the concept of an entrepreneurial university. A pedagogical university acts as a key element of the ecosystem if it demonstrates an entrepreneurial type of behavior, overcomes resource constraints due to the dominance of the third mission over education and research, subordinating them to the task of creating a cohort of agents of change – vanguard groups of future a working teachers in the territory. Conclusion: the missions of the pedagogical university should be subordinated to the influence on the entire pedagogical corps of the region by increasing the density of connections in educational and professional communities.
Keywords: 
pedagogical university, mission of the university, ecosystem of education, post-non-classical methodology
Please register
References: 

1. Yudkevich, M. M., Altbakh, F., Rambly, L., ed., 2016. Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education: A Global Perspective. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russ.)
2. Balmasova, T. A., 2016. «Third Mission» of the University – a New Vector of Development? Higher Education in Russia, no. 8-9 (204), pp. 48–55. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Budanov, V. G., 2009. Methodology of synergetics in post-non-classical science principles and perspectives. Post-non-classical: philosophy, science, culture. St. Petersburg, pp. 361–396. (In Russ.)
4. Grigoryeva, E. G., Novopashina, L. A., Bocharova, Y. Y., 2019. Socio-demographic and professional characteristics of academic staff at a regional university. Science for Education Today, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 170–187. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.12 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Konstantinov, G. N., Filonovich, S. R., 2007. What is an entrepreneurial university. Educational Studies, no. 1, pp. 49–62 (In Russ.)
6. Kremneva, L. V., Zavedensky, K. E., Rabinovich, P. D., Apenko, S. N., 2020. Strategizing Education: Ecosystem Transition. Integration of Education, no. 24 (4), pp. 656–677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.101.024.202004.656-677 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Loshkareva, E., Luksha, P., Ninenko, I., Smagin, I., Sudakov, D. Skills of the future. How to thrive in the complex new world. Available at: https://futuref.org/futureskills_ru (accessed 28.07.2021) (In Russ.)
8. Luksha, P., Rabinovich, P., Asmolov, A., ed., 2017. Education for a complex world: why, what and how. Global Education Leaders’ Partnership Moscow. October 31 – November 3 (forum report) [online]. Available at: https://futuref.org/educationfutures_ru (accessed: 20.07.2021) (In Russ.)
9. Prozumentova, G. N., ed., 2009. Moving to an Open Education Space. Vol. 1. Phenomenology of educational innovation. Tomsk, 448 p. (In Russ.)
10. Lenskaya, E. M., Pinskaya, M., ed., 2015. Russian teachers in the mirror of the international comparative study of the pedagogical corps
(TALIS 2013). Higher School of Economics. Moscow: HSE Publishing House (In Russ.)
11. Sen’ko, Yu. V., Frolovskaya, M. N., 2017. The humanitarian grounds of the cluster approach in the training of teachers. The world of science, culture, education, no. 1 (62), pp. 153–155. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gumanitarnoe-osnovanie-klasternogo-pod... (accessed 25.07.2021) (In Russ.)
12. Slobodchikov, V. I., 2010. Co-existence educational community – the source of development and the subject of education. Studies, Vol. 3. Psychology. Pedagogy, no. 2 (10), pp. 3–8
(In Russ.)
13. Spenser-Keis, D., Luksha, P., Kubista, D., 2020. Education ecosystems: emerging practices for future education. Available at: https://learningecosystems2020.globaledufutures.org/ru (accessed 20.07.2021) (In Eng.)
14. Shhedrovickij, P. G., 2016. Norms of educational culture in the face of the third industrial revolution. XX International Scientific and Practical Tutor Conference. Tomsk, February 1. Available at: https://shchedrovitskiy.com/normi-obrazovatelnoy-kultury/ (accessed: 20.07.2021)
(In Russ.)
15. Bocharova, J. Yu., 2018. Expected Outcomes of Teacher Internship, or a Pedagogical University Graduate Trapped in Standards. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 174–184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17516/1997–1370– 0178 (In Eng.)
16. Bush, A., Grotjohann, N., 2020. Collaboration in teacher education: A cross-sectional study on future teachers’ attitudes towards collaboration, their intentions to collaborate and their performance of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, no. 88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102968 (accessed 25.07.2021) (In Eng.)
17. Cheri, Ch., 2019. Crossing institutional borders: Exploring pre-service teacher education partnerships through the lens of border theory. Teaching and Teacher Education, no. 86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102893 (accessed 25.07.2021) (In Eng.)
18. Cornelissen, F., Daly, A., Liou, Y., Van Swet, J., Beijaard, D., Bergen, T., 2014. Leveraging the relationship: knowledge processes in school–university research networks of master’s programmes. Research Papers in Education.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2014.919522 (accessed 25.07.2021) (In Eng.)
19. Patarakin, Y., Vachkova, S. N., Burov, V., 2021. Agent-based modeling of teacher interaction within a repository of digital objects. The Third Annual International Symposium “Education and City: Education and Quality of Living in the City” (Education and City 2020), vol. 98, SHS Web of Conferences, Ch. 05013, pp. 1–7. (In Eng.)