UDC: 
378+004.9
Stupin Andrey Anatolyevich
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Information Systems and Digital Education of the Institute of Physics, Mathematics, Information and Technology Education, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, aastupin@gmail.com, Novosibirsk
Stupina Elena Evgenievna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof., Deputy Director of the Institute of Physics, Mathematics, Information and Technology Education, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, stupina.ee@yandex.ru, Novosibirsk
Kamenev Roman Vladimirovich
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof., Professor, Director of the Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Information and Technology Education, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, romank54.55@gmail.com, Novosibirsk
Klassov Alexander Borisovich
Кандидат технических наук, Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Information Systems and Digital Education, Institute of Physics, Mathematics, Information and Technology Education, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, alklas@mail.ru, Novosibirsk

The use of End-to-End Digital Technologies for Teaching Schoolchildren Programming of Robotic Devices

Abstract: 
The article deals with the issue of mastering end-to-end digital technologies by schoolchildren. The authors analyze all existing approaches in teaching schoolchildren programming of robotic devices. The expediency of applying existing approaches in teaching programming to schoolchildren is substantiated and the most effective of them is revealed. The purpose of the article is to present and justify the most effective approach in teaching schoolchildren programming of robotic devices in the context of personalization of schoolchildren’s educational trajectories. Research methodology and methods. The research methodology is based on a comparative analysis of the results of experimental work to identify the most effective approach in teaching schoolchildren to program robotic devices in the context of personalization of schoolchildren’s educational trajectories. Research results, discussion. Comparative and comparative analysis of the results of experimental work to identify the most effective approach in teaching schoolchildren to program robotic devices in the context of personalization of schoolchildren’s educational trajectories. Conclusion. The prospects of the obtained presented data are associated with solving the problem of increasing the level of proficiency in end-to-end digital technologies in the context of personalizing the educational trajectories of schoolchildren. For teachers of schools, centers of additional education working in a digital educational environment, it is necessary to take into account in their work special conditions and principles to increase the level of proficiency in end-to-end digital technologies.
Keywords: 
digitalization of education, digital educational environment, education, training, upbringing, personality development, end-to-end digital technologies, educational trajectories, programming
References: 

1. Varlashin, V. V., Shmakov, O. A., 2018. Methods of teaching robotics based on the Arduino platform as part of additional education in educational institutions. Robotics and technical cybernetics, no. 2 (19), pp. 16–20. (In Russ.)
2. Ershov, M. G., 2014. Robotics as a means of individualization of the educational process in physics. Perm Pedagogical Journal, no. 5, pp. 104–109. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Markushevich, M. V., 2020. Organization of remote teaching of robotics based on the Arduino Uno microcontroller in the virtual environment of Autodesk Tinkercad. Informatics at school, no. 8 (161), pp. 12–20. (In Russ.)
4. Mordvinov, D. A., Litvinov, Y. V., 2016. Comparison of educational environments for visual programming of robots. Computer tools in education, no. 3, pp. 32–49. (In Russ.)
5. Oleinikova, O. D., Sidorina, A. A., Chechulin, T. V., Khudoroshko, L. A., 1999. Introduction to the psychology and technology of research activities: a textbook for graduate students and applicants. Novosibirsk: NSPU Publ., 220 p. (In Russ.)
6. Samarina, A. E., 2018. Possibilities of using Arduino visual programming environments in teaching robotics. Development of scientific and technical creativity of children and youth. Collection of scientific papers of the II All-Russian scientific-practical conference with international participation, pp. 40–46. (In Russ.)
7. Sartakov, I. V., Kamenev, R. V., Stupina, E. E., Stupin, A. A., Klassov, A. B., 2022. Development of a model for increasing R.V. the level of proficiency in end-to-end digital technologies in the context of personalization of schoolchildren’s educational trajectories. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no. 1, pp. 19–32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Simonov, V. P., 1999. Diagnosis of the degree of learning of students: educational and reference manual. Moscow: MRA Publ., 48 p. (In Russ.)
9. Chupin, D. Y., Stupin, A. A., Stupina, E. E., Klassov, A. B., 2019. Educational robotics: textbook. Novosibirsk: Sibprint Publ., 114 p. (In Russ.)
10. Yakovlev, E. V., Yakovleva, N. O., 2010. Pedagogical research: content and presentation of results. Chelyabinsk: RBIU Publ., 317 p. (In Russ.)
11. Müller, Martin, 2017. Der kleine Hacker: Programmieren für Einsteiger mit Arduino: Spielerisch Grundkenntnisse der Elektronik erwerben und mit ArduBlock programmieren. German: Franzis Verlag GmbH, 98 p. (In German)