DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2204.10
UDC: 
372.881.161.1
Zajdman Irina Naumovna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Professor of Department of Modern Russian and Technique methodology, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, mpri@bk.r, Novosibirsk

Discussing a draft of an example working program of basic general education in Russian language

Abstract: 
The article analyzes the Draft of an exemplary work program for basic general education in the Russian language for grades 5–9. The purpose of the article is to determine the compliance of the Project with the tasks of the modern school and the Federal State Educational Standard, determine the continuity in the content of education, identify controversial issues and formulate proposals for improving the Project. Methodology: theoretical (linguo-methodological) analysis of the document from the standpoint of traditional and modern linguistics and methodology, practice of teaching the Russian language in grades 5-9. Positively evaluating the fact of creating the Draft Exemplary Work Program, the author dwells in detail on the identified theoretical linguistic inaccuracies, primarily of a classification nature, as well as methodological shortcomings. Comments were made both of a general plan, relating to the entire program, and private, concerning individual topics, sections, and the distribution of material by class. There are cases of violation of continuity and prospects in the content of teaching the Russian language and insufficient specification of a number of didactic units and skills. The overload of the 5th grade program is argued in detail and recommendations are made for its correction by studying part of the linguistic information at the propaedeutic level. At the end of the article, it is concluded that it is necessary to improve the Draft Exemplary Work Program, proposals are presented aimed at correcting it, in particular, eliminating the identified theoretical errors, cases of discontinuity, more optimal distribution of linguistic material by year of study.
Keywords: 
russian language, basic general education, work program, subject outcomes, learning content, metasubject outcomes
Please register
References: 

1. Aleksandrova, O. M., Dobrotina, I. N., Gosteva, Yu. P., Vasilyeva, I. P., 2021. Work program in the Russian language for the basic school: the main linguodidactic approaches to the selection of content. Educational space in the information era. Sat. scientific works. International scientific and practical conference. Moscow, pp. 44–51. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Arbatsky, D. I., 1970. The main ways of interpreting the meaning of words. Russian language at school, no. 3, pp. 26–31. (In Russ.)
3. Belyaev, G. Yu., 2019. Some conclusions and reflections on the results of a comparative analysis of existing programs for the education and socialization of students. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no. 6, pp. 7–21. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Valieva, Ch. R., Khafizova, E. R., 2019. “Language portfolio” as one of the forms of self-development and self-learning in Russian language lessons in the context of the implementation of the Federal State Educational Standard. Actual problems of innovative pedagogical education, no. 1, pp. 23–27. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Verbitskaya, L. A., Moskovkin, L. V., 2014. Problems of language and literary education at school and university. Dynamics of language and cultural processes in modern Russia. St. Petersburg: Society of Teachers of Russian Language and Literature, pp. 3–11. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Gogolina, T. V., Ivanova, E. N., 2018. Olympiad in the Russian language as a means of increasing the motivation of schoolchildren to study linguistic disciplines. Pedagogical education in Russia, no. 12, pp. 91–94. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Deikina, A. D., 2017. Semantic resources in the school course of the Russian language. Methodological linguoconceptology: results and development prospects: monograph. St. Petersburg: Knizhny Dom, pp. 109–125. (In Russ.)
8. Zaydman, I. N., 2001. Teaching reasoning taking into account the level of development of schoolchildren: a teaching aid. Novosibirsk: NGPU Publ., 131 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kolesnikova, I. L., Dolgina, O. A., 2001. English-Russian terminological reference book on the methodology of teaching foreign languages. St. Petersburg: Russian-Baltic Information Center “BLITZ” Publ., Cambridge University Press Publ.,
pp. 101–106. (In Russ.)
10. Kulish, L. Yu., 1991. General methods of teaching foreign languages: Reader, edited by A. A. Leontiev. Moscow: Russian language Publ., 357 p. (In Russ.)
11. Linetskaya, L. M., Kalimulina, R. M., 2018. Questions of vocabulary enrichment methodology in the works of M. T. Baranov. Prospects for the development of modern humanitarian knowledge. Sat. materials of the International scientific-practical conference, managing editor L. V. Klimina. Sterlitamak: Sterlitamak branch of “Bashkir State University” Publ., pp. 129–132. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Linetskaya, L. M., Rakoed, Yu. S., 2018. Questions of the study of morphology in conjunction with syntax in the scientific and methodological works of V. P. Ozerskaya. Prospects for the development of modern humanitarian knowledge. Sat. International scientific-practical conference, managing editor L. V. Klimina. Sterlitamak: Sterlitamak branch of “Bashkir State University” Publ., pp. 101–106. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Baranov, M. T., ed., 2001. Methods of teaching the Russian language at school: a textbook for students of higher pedagogical educational institutions. Moscow: Publishing Center “Academy”, 336 p. (In Russ.)
14. Meshcheryakov, V. N., 2017. Genres of school compositions. Theory and practice of writing: textbook.-method. allowance. Moscow: FLINTA Publ., Nauka Publ., 328 p. (In Russ.)
15. Nechaeva, N. V., Yakovleva, S. G., 2017. Discussing the concept of teaching the Russian language and literature in the Russian Federation. Methodist, no. 2, pp. 2–5. (In Russ.)
16. Nikitina, E. Yu., Milyutina, A. A., 2018. Formation of media competence in the Russian language lessons is one of the components of the language portrait of a modern primary school student. Philological education during childhood, no. 25, pp. 76–81. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
17. Sviridova, A. V., 2018. On the problem of representing the language system in the textbook “Russian language” according to the concept “Perspective elementary school”. Philological education during childhood, no. 25, pp. 82–88. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
18. Ladyzhenskaya, T. A., ed., 1978. The system of teaching essays at the lessons of the Russian language (grades 4-8). Moscow: Education Publ., 288 p. (In Russ.)
19. Khodyakova, L. A., 2018. Methods of speech development of a schoolchild’s creative personality in the context of culture: theory and practice: monograph. Moscow: MPSU Publ., 188 p. (In Russ.)
20. Khodyakova, L. A., Suprunova, A. V., 2018. The concept and content of the program of extracurricular activities: the formation of general cultural competence of schoolchildren through the creation of a dictionary of cultural literacy. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Pedagogy, no. 4, pp. 58–69. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
21. Shagina, Yu. V., Kitov, A. Yu., 2019. Development of elective courses in the Russian language and literature as an element of preparation for the exam. Siberian teacher, no. 4 (125), pp. 106–109. (In Russ.)
22. Yurtaev, S. V., 2017. Trends in the content of teaching Russian language to junior schoolchildren. International Journal of Experimental Education, no. 8, pp. 92–96. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
23. Yashina, N. Yu., 2020. Teaching Russian as a native language in elementary school: problems and ways to solve them. Ethnic Culture, no. 2 (3), pp. 115–118. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
24. Rost, M., 2011. Teaching and researching listening. Second edition. Harlow: Longman Publ., 407 p. (In Eng.)