DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2205.01
UDC: 
378.1
Bocharova Julia Yurevna
Кандидат педагогических наук, associate professor, assistant professor of Department of social pedagogy and social work, Krasnoyarsk state pedagogical University. B. N. Astaf'eva, bocharova1305@kspu.ru, Krasnoyarsk

Modelling Ecosystems of Pedagogical Education in the Postnonclassical Paradigm

Abstract: 
The problem of modelling open systems in education, in which non-linear processes take place, requires the use of postnonclassical methodology. Reflection of the reality of pedagogical education which exists in the form of an ecosystem of formal institutions, urban educational formats, educational platforms and communities of practice playing an important role in the development of a future teacher, is possible when building a dynamic model for the development of a professional community and a teacher in it. Research methodology and methods: social constructionism and synergetics as a general scientific methodology of postnonclassical science, analogy, action research, interviews, network analysis, modelling, mathematical description of a model. The purpose of the article is to characterize the application of modelling as a particular methodology in the postnonclassical paradigm of the study of pedagogical education and to propose a prototype of mathematical description of the local (regional) ecosystem of open pedagogical education. The results were obtained during constructing the model in a temporary research team by modelling in action (by the Action Research type) on the local system of engineering and technology education in Krasnoyarsk. Attractors-competences and lead functions have been identified, mathematical coefficients have been developed to track the dynamics of the development in the ecosystem of pedagogical education based on the growth of diversity in the system. In conclusion, specific characteristics of modelling pedagogical education in the postnonclassical paradigm have been highlighted.
Keywords: 
postnonclassical methodology; pedagogical education; dynamic models
Please register
References: 

1. Atlas of new professions 3.0. Moscow, 2020 [online]. Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=10149 (accessed 28.06.2022). (In Russ.)
2. Bocharova, Yu. Yu., 2021. Missions of the Regional Pedagogical University: post-non-classical understanding. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no. 6, pp. 7–15. DOI: 10.15293/1813-4718.2106.01. (In Russ.)
3. Bocharova, Yu. Yu., 2019. On the essence of the practice of open pedagogical education. Person and education, no. 4 (61), pp. 36–42. (In Russ.)
4. Gutman, V. A., 2013. The essence of the CDIO global initiative and the experience of its application in the education system. Modern problems of science and education, no. 5 [online]. Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=10149 (accessed: 28.06.2022). (In Russ.)
5. Vorobyov, D. V., 2016. Conventionalism and instrumentalism in the light of the theory of research programs by Imre Lakatos. Philosophy of Science and Technology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 97–110. (In Russ.)
6. Dahin, A. N., 2010. Modeling in Pedagogy. Ideas and Ideals, vol. 2, no. 1 (3), pp. 11–20. (In Russ.)
7. Zair-Bek, E. S., 2017. Modern methodology of project research of innovations in education. Proceedings of the Russian State Pedagogical University A. I. Herzen, no. 185, pp. 15–23. (In Russ.)
8. Kureichik, V. M., Pisarenko, V. I., 2013. Synergetic principles in modeling pedagogical systems. Open Education, no. 6 (101), pp. 6–23. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2013-6 (101-16-23. (In Russ.)
9. Kraevsky, V. V., 1994. Methodology of Pedagogical Research: A Handbook for the Teacher-Researcher. Samara, 165 p. (In Russ.)
10. Lebedev, S. A., 2019. Three epistemological paradigms: classical, non-classical and post-non-classical. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Philosophical Sciences, no. 2, pp. 8–21. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7227-2019-2-8-21. (In Russ.)
11. Obolensky, D. M., Shevchenko, V. I., 2020. Conceptual model of the intellectual educational ecosystem. Economics. Informatics, no. 47 (2), pp. 390–401. DOI: 10.18413/2687-0932-2020-47-2-390-401. (In Russ.)
12. Patarakin, E. D., Vachkova, S. N., 2019. Network analysis of collective actions over digital educational objects. Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series “Pedagogy and psychology”, no. 4 (50), pp. 101–112. DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2019.50.4.09 (In Russ.)
13. Prozumentova, G. N., 2012. The potential of interaction between universities and schools: empirical models [online]. Tomsk State University Journal, no. 358, pp. 182–187. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/potentsial-vzaimodeystviya-vuzov-i-shk... (accessed: 09.07.2022) (In Russ.)
14. Spencer-Kase, D, Luksha, P, Kubista, D. Educational Ecosystems: Emerging Practices for the Future of Education [online]. Available at: https://learningecosystems2020.globaledufutures.org/ru (accessed 20.07.2022).
15. Ushakov, K. M., 2017. How to make the school better, or Social capital as a priority. Moscow, 160 p. (In Russ.)
16. Chistova, Ya. S., 2016. Dynamic modeling of the training system for masters of vocational education. Cand. Sci. (Pedagogical). Yekaterinburg, 193 p. (In Russ.)
17. Yadrovskaya, M. V., 2013. Models in Pedagogy. Tomsk State University Journal, no. 366, pp. 139–143 (In Russ.)
18. Yakovlev, E. V., Yakovleva, N. O., 2006. Pedagogical concept: methodological aspects of construction. Мoscow, 239 p. (In Russ.)
19. Yakovleva, A. Yu. Factors and models of formation and development of innovative ecosystems. Cand. Sci. (Economy) [online]. Available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2012/05/31/1250851792/disser_Yakovleva.pdf. (accessed 12.07.2022).
(In Russ.)
20. Riggall, A., Churches, R., Elwick, A. Action research for school improvement [online]. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED546810.pdf. (accessed 12.07.2022). (In Eng.)
21. Rowell, L. L., 2006. Action Research and School Counseling: Closing the Gap Between Research and Practice. Professional School Counseling, April. DOI: 10.5330/prsc.9.4.g777740821404674. (In Eng.)