Selivanova Nataliya Leonidovna
Доктор педагогических наук, Full member of the Russian Academy of Education, Dr. Sci. (Pedag.), Prof., Chief Researcher at the Laboratory of Personal Development in the Educational System, Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education, nselivanova2000@mail.ru, Moscow
Shakurova Marina Viktorovna
Доктор педагогических наук, Dr. Sci. (Pedag.), Prof., Leading Analyst, Educational Content Development and Socialization Laboratory, Center of Upbringing and Personal Development, Russian Academy of Education,Prof. of the Department of Social Pedagogy, Voronezh state pedagogical university, shakurova@mail.ru, Voronezh
Kiseleva Elena Vasilievna
Доктор педагогических наук, Associate Professor, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Institute of History, Humanities and Social Education, Novosibirsk state pedagogical university, elena_mig@mail.ru, Novosibirsk
Romm Tatyana Alexandrovna
Доктор педагогических наук, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Pedagogics and Psychology Institute of History, Humanitarian and Social Education, Novosibirsk state pedagogical university, tromm@mail.ru, Novosibirsk

Methods of Obtaining Scientific Knowledge in the Theory of Upbringing

The article contains the main materials of the “round table” devoted to modern trends in the field of methodology for obtaining scientific knowledge in the theory of upbringing. The participants in a lively discussion described the modern methods of scientific research in the theory of upbringing. The authors argue that in modern post-non-classical pedagogy, the authority of qualitative methods of scientific research is growing. Qualitative methods of pedagogical research complement and refine the results obtained by quantitative methods of data collection and processing. The discussion showed that the identified trend is of particular importance for the development of the theory of upbringing, in particular, for solving topical issues of pedagogical expertise of the process of upbringing and for developing modern methods for assessing the results of upbringing. The discussion was held on April 10, 2023 at the Russian Academy of Education. The Scientific Council on Educational Problems at the Department of Philosophy and Theoretical Pedagogy of the Russian Academy of Education organized this discussion. The transcript of the discussion is published with abbreviations.
upbringing; scientific knowledge; research methods; result evaluation; scientific school

1. Methods of obtaining scientific knowledge in the theory of education: a modern reading. Tver: Stimul Publ., 2017, 179 p. (In Russ.)
2. Kasatkina, T. A., 2017. On the subject-subjective method of reading. New World, no. 1 [online]. Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/novyi_mi/2017/1/o-subekt-subektnom-metode-... (accessed: 27.05.2023) (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Stepin, V. S., 2003. Teoretical knowledge. Structure, historical evolution. Moscow: Progress-Tradiciya Publ., 744 p. (In Russ.)
4. Arlamov, A. A., Pochter, R. V., 2008. Problems of Pedagogy Methodology: Post-Neoclassical Approach. Pedagogy, no. 5, pp. 98–104. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Stepin, V. С., 2003. Self-developing systems and postnonclassical rationality. Questions of Philosophy, no. 8, pp. 5–17. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Budanov, V. G., 2007. Synergetic Methodology in Post-Neoclassical Science and Education. Moscow: LKI Publ., 240 p. (In Russ.)
7. Majuga, A. G., Sinitsina, I. A., Abdullina, L. B., 2014. Fractal-resonance approach as a methodology of post-non-classical humanitarian knowledge. Higher Education Today, no. 11, pp. 61–66. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Kiseleva, E. V., 2020. Pedagogical expertise of the upbringing process: monograph. Novosibirsk: NSPU Publ., 186 p.
9. Sawilowsky, S. S., 2009. New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100 (In Eng.)
10. Demakova, I. D., 2023. Longitudinal method of researching the results of the educational activities of a teacher. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no. 2, pp. 7–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2302.01 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Romm, T. A., 2014. Formation and development of the interpretative image of social education in national pedagogy. Bulletin of PSTSU IV: Pedagogy. Psychology, vol. 4 (35), pp. 32–43 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Shaposhnikov, V. А., 2019. To outdo kuhn: on some prerequisites for treating the computer revolution as a revolution in mathematics. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 169–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956357 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)