DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2402.05
UDC: 
37.0
Yarmak Kirill Vladimirovich
Кандидат юридических наук, Head of the Department of Educational and Methodological Work, Moscow University of MIA of Russia named by V.Y. Kikot, kirill.77@mail.ru, Moscow

System Analysis of Indicators of the Effectiveness of Digital Support of the Educational Process

Abstract: 
The article considers digital support of the educational process, which is an important aspect of the organization of education at the present stage of development. It can significantly improve the effectiveness of teaching and learning, but requires a scientifically sound approach to assessing its effectiveness. Regardless of the perspective from which effectiveness is considered (from the individual’s point of view, from the University’s point of view, or from society’s point of view), there are a number of common criteria that are used to evaluate it. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic analysis of indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of digital support for education. For this purpose, various methods of scientific knowledge were used, including empirical and theoretical methods, as well as qualitative methods. The result of the work was a systematic consideration of indicators in the structure of the system of effectiveness criteria, which will help to monitor and evaluate the digital support of education at all levels in relation to all its subjects. When assessing effectiveness, it is very important to consider several criteria rather than focusing on a single aspect. This is because an impact can be effective in achieving one goal, but have negative consequences in other areas. Taking into account multiple criteria allows for a complete and balanced evaluation. We propose to consider the evaluation of the effectiveness of digital support of the learning process through the analysis of effectiveness criteria, which are classified into five major groups. We emphasize didactic, process, motivational, competence and value criteria. In our opinion, this structure best expresses a set of indicators, using which the implementation of efficiency assessment will be effective.
Keywords: 
digital support; performance assessment; performance criteria; performance indicators; learning process
References: 

1. Golovach, V. M., Krivushina, O. A., Potapova, A. V., 2020. Transformation of higher education in the conditions of digital technology development. Issues of education and psychology. Cheboksary: Sreda Publ., pp. 46–65. (In Russ.)
2. Vayndorf-Sysoeva, M. E., Shitova, V. A., 2013. About the models of distance education technologies application in a modern higher education institution. Bulletin of the Moscow State Humanitarian University named after M. A. Sholokhov. Pedagogy and psychology, no. 4. pp. 29–34. (In Russ.)
3. Biryukova, E. A., Gonchar, M. V., Lapshonkova, A. R., 2018. Efficiency assessment as a mechanism of education quality management in the conditions of digitalization. Modern Education: vectors of development. Digitalization of economy and society: challenges for the education system: Proceedings of the international conference (Moscow, April 24–25, 2018). Moscow: Moscow Pedagogical State University, pp. 85–95. (In Russ.)
4. Detkin, A. N., Davydova, G. I., 2022. Efficiency of pedagogical support in the process of increasing the digital competence of employees. Professional education and labor market, no. 1 (48), pp. 127–142. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Ragimova, S., 2018. Time of the super smart. Kommersant Business Guide No. 20., May 23 [online]. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/private/pdoc?docsid=3636288 (accessed: 03.12.2023). (In Russ.)
6. Fundamental model of skills. Global Education Futures Foundation & WorldSkills Russia [online]. Available at: https://futureskills2020s.com/ru#rec277278874 (accessed 02.12.2023). (In Russ.)
7. Karmazin, T., 2019. Values and key competencies in the era of digital-society. RIA “Standards and Quality” [online]. Available at: https://ria-stk.ru/ds/adetail.php?ID=181143 (accessed: 03.12.2023). (In Russ.)
8. Ulyanova, I. V., 2022. Preparation of cadets of educational organizations of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia to public speeches. Vestnik of economic security, no. 6, pp. 339–344. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Strekalova, N. B., 2019. Risks of the introduction of digital technologies in education. Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogy, philology, Т. 25, no. 2, pp. 84–88. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Jano, D., 2021. Educational sphere in the conditions of the fourth industrial revolution. Effective management systems: quality and digital intelligent systems: proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Forum (Kazan, April 15–16, 2021). Kazan: Poznanie Publishing House, pp. 43–47. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Andreeva, G. N., Badalyants, S. V., Bogatyreva, T. G. [et al.], 2018. Development of digital economy in Russia as a key factor of economic growth and improving the quality of life. Nizhny Novgorod: Professional Science Publ., 131 p.
(In Russ.)
12. Ulyanova, I. V., 2022. Pedagogy of meaning-life orientations: the return of Russian schoolchildren and students to national traditions. Meaning-making and its contexts: life, structure, culture, experience: Collection of scientific papers. Electronic edition. Moscow: Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, pp. 76–83. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Ulyanova, I. V., 2021. Cyberspace in the context of pedagogy of meaning-life orientations. Psychological problems of the meaning of life and acme: Electronic Proceedings of the XXVI International Symposium (Moscow, April 13–14, 2021). Moscow: Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, pp. 112–117. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Kuzin, A. S., 2022. Motivational-value criterion of education of vigilance in ensuring information security in cadets of a military university. Notes of the scientist, no. 7, pp. 130–132. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Olkhovaya, T. A., 2007. Becoming the subjectivity of the university student. Abstract Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences. Orenburg, 430 p. (In Russ.)
16. Korneva, V. V., 2005. Development of value orientations of student youth in the pedagogical process of higher education. Abstract Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Khabarovsk, 24 p. (In Russ.).
17. Kovlakas, N. V., 2009. Moral criteria of law-enforcement activity. Abstract Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Rostov on Don, 28 p. (In Russ.)
18. Erdniev, A. С., 2020. Professional worldview of a police officer: research methodology, structure and mechanisms of its formation during training. Innovations in Education, no. 4, pp. 29–41. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)