UDC: 
378+159.9
Kavun Lyudmila Viktorovna
Кандидат психологических наук, Assoc. Prof. of the Department of psychology and pedagogy, Novosibirsk State Technical University, kavun@corp.nstu.ru, Novosibirsk

PECULIARITIES OF LEARNING IN RESEARCH OF VALUE-MEANING SPHERE IN PREPARING UNDERGRADUATE OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TO SCIENTIFIC WORK

Abstract: 
We are showing the necessity of the use of special ways of learning of undergraduate to research methods. Difficulty learning consist of methodological contradictions that are important in the study of complex psychological phenomena of natural and the humanities paradigms. They differ in the principles and methods. Researchers must have a high level of professionalism in conducting qualitative, phenomenological research, and a small amount of sample causes mistrust among representatives of academic science. Undergraduates rarely use them in research. we describe the form of training, which allows undergraduates to acquire skills of complex psychological research. As a phenomenon that can be studied in this way is considered a values and meaning of life of the person, as its empirical study requires the use of an integrated research strategy and different, complementary methods.
Keywords: 
values and meaning of life of person, quantitative and qualitative research methods in psychology, complex psychological research
Please register
References: 

1. Burlachuk L.F., Korzhova E.Yu (1998) Psikhologiya zhiznennykh situatsij [Psychology life situations]. Moscow: Russian pedagogical Agency, 263 p.
2. Druzhinin V.N. (2011) Eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya [Experimental psychology]. St. Pe-tersburg: Piter, 320 p.
3. Leont'ev D.А. (2007) Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoj real'nosti [Psychology of sense: nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality]. Moscow: Smysl,. 511 p.
4. Petrenko V. F. Lichnost' cheloveka - osnova ego kartiny mira [His personality is the basis of his picture of the world]. Modeli mira [Models of the world]. Moscow: Russian Association of ar-tificial intelligence, 1997, p.p. 9-24 (in Russ.).
5. Seryj А. V., Yanitskij M. S. (1999) Tsennostno-smyslovaya sfera lichnosti / Uchebnoe poso-bie. [Value-semantic sphere of personality / tutorial]. Kemerovo: Kemerovo state University, 92 p.
6. Solomin I.L. (2002) «Zhiznennyj put'» metodika risunochnykh metafor. Metodicheskoe ruko-vodstvo ["Life path" methodology picturesque metaphors. Methodological guidance]. St. Petersburg: GMNPP «Imaton», – 64 p.
7. Tarakanov А.V. (2010) Evolyutsiya tsennostno-smyslovykh orientatsij i komponentov krea-tivnosti v protsesse professional'nogo obucheniya studentov-psikhologov [Evolution of axiological orientations and components of creativity in the process of professional training of students-psychologists]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya [philosophy of education]. No 3(32), p.p. 178-183 (in Russ., abstact. in Eng.).
8. Ulanovskij А.M. (2012) Fenomenologicheskaya psikhologiya: kachestvennye issledovaniya i rabota s perezhivaniem [Phenomenological psychology: qualitative research and work experience]. Moscow: Smysl,. 255 p.
9. Federal state educational standard of higher professional education in the field of training 030300 Psychology (qualification (degree) "master"). Available at: http://www.umo.msu.ru/index.php?file_name=STATIC/fgos.html (in Russ.).
10. Yan'shin P.V. (2007) Klinicheskaya psikhodiagnostika lichnosti [Clinical psychodiagnostics of personality]. St. Petersburg: Rech', 320 p.
11. Schwartz S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries // In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25) (pp. 1—65). New York: Academic Press.