Dzhurinskiy Alexander Naumovich
Доктор педагогических наук, Prof. of the Department of pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow State Pedagogical University, djurins@yandex.ru, Moscow


In the article, in comparative terms, the author examinesthe theory and practice of compensatory education in secondary school in leading foreign countries, the recipients of which are lagging students (students with academic problems), students who have problems with the law, gifted children, children with disabilities, immigrants and all other groups of children who can use it. Suchinterrelatedconcepts as: the quality of education, effectiveness of education, compensatory education are used in the article. The quality of education is defined as the achievement of educational objectives. Under the effectiveness of education we understand - bridging the gap between educational objectives and the realities of General Education. Under compensatory training – additional pedagogical efforts of teachers and students, to increase the effectiveness of education and thereby to solve the task of improving its quality.The author analyses the prospects of application of foreign experience of compensatory education in the national school.
compensatory education, performance assessment, education of low achieved, education of delinquents, education of gifted children, education of handicapped children, education of immigrants.

Dzhurinskiy A. N. (2008)Kontseptsiiirealiimul'tikul'turnogovospitaniya: sravnitel'nyyanaliz [Concepts and realities of multicultural education: comparative analysis]. Moscow: Academia Publ., 303 p.
Dzhurinskiy A. N. (2000)Modernizatsiyaobrazovaniyaivospitaniya v SShA[Modernization of education and education in the USA].Moscow: URAO Publ., 96 p.
Dzhurinskiy A. N. (2013) Sravnitel'nayapedagogika.VzglyadizRossii. [Comparative pedagogics.A look from Russia]. Moscow: Yurayt Publ., 159 p.
Dzhurinskiy A. N. (2014) Sravnitel'noeobrazovanie.Vyzovy XXI v. [Comparative education.Calls of XXI в.]. Moscow: Yurayt Publ., 440 p.
Dzhurinskiy A. N. (2014) Strategiipovysheniyakachestvaobshchegoobrazovaniyazarubezhom: sravnitel'nyyanaliz [Strategy of improvement of quality of the general education abroad: comparative analysis]. Naukaishkola [Science and school]. No 4, pp. 72 – 79 (in Russ.).
Dzhurinskiy A. N. (1997) Chemuikakuchatshkol'nikov v Yaponii[To that and as teach school students in Japan]. Moscow: RossiyskoePed. Obshchestvo Publ., 84 p.
Dzhurinskiy A. N. (1998) ShkolaFrantsii: poraperemen [School of France: time of changes]. Moscow: URAO Publ., 79 p.
Lorcerie F. (2005) Culture, identité, ethnicité. Repenser l’approche interculturelle // in Bertucci M.-M. & Houdart-Merot V. (éd.), Situations de banlieues. Enseignement, langues, cultures. Р.
Meunier O.(2008)Les approches interculturelles dans le système scolaire français: vers une ouverture de la forme scolaire à la pluralité culturelle // Socio-logos. Revue de l'association française de sociologie, No 3. [Электронныйресурс]. URL: http://socio-logos.revues.org(датаобращения: 08 мая 2015).
Remarks of U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan // U.S. Department of Education (2012). [Электронный ресурс]. – URL: http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/working-nation-lowest-pefoming-schools-p.... (датаобращения: 08.05.2015).
Salanié B. The Riots in France: An Economist's View.Jun 11, 2006 - URL: http://riotsfrance.ssrc.org/Salanie/ (дата обращения: 08.05.2015)
Smith D.J. and Tomlinson S. (1989) The School Effect. A Study of Multi-Racial Comprehensives .London: Policy Studies Institute.
Sternberg R. J. (1985) Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Intelligence. – CambridgeUniversity Press: Cambridge.Pp. 411.
Vallet L-A.andCaille J.-P.(1999) Migration and Integration in France.Academic Careers of Immigrants’ Children. ESF Conference [Электронныйресурс] – URL: (датаобращения: 08/05/2015)