DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2405.05
UDC: 
377.5
Tropnikova Valeriya Valerievna
lecturer, Novosibirsk Medical College, Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, tropnikova@inbox.ru, Novosibirsk

Digital instruments in the educational environment of the system of secondary vocational education

Abstract: 
The application of digital laboratories using digital sensors and microscopy in chemistry teaching is considered. Their influence on improving the quality of students’ professional training in the conditions of digital transformation of educational environment in curricular and extracurricular training trajectories is evaluated. The aim of the article is to analyze the effectiveness of using digital laboratories; to identify the advantages and potential difficulties of implementing these technologies in the educational process; to develop recommendations for teachers on the optimal use of digital tools in the conditions of digital transformation of education. Methodology. The study includes literature review, experiential learning using digital labs, student and faculty questionnaires, and statistical analysis of data to assess the impact of digital tools on chemistry instruction in medical school. Results. It has been demonstrated that mastering theoretical material in chemistry and the conscious application of digital laboratories during practical sessions contribute to a deeper understanding of chemical processes, enhance students’ motivation to study the subject, and improve their practical skills. This, in turn, leads to an overall increase in academic achievements and the effectiveness of the educational process. Extracurricular trajectories and interdisciplinary projects partially offset the lack of instructional hours by integrating knowledge from various fields, ultimately enhancing the overall value and flexibility of the educational process. Conclusion. It is determined that the educational environment, integrating a set of teaching tools, including digital laboratories and microscopy, into the system of secondary medical education, as well as expanding the use of not only curricular but also extracurricular learning trajectories, promotes deep learning of theoretical material and development of necessary practical skills and professional competencies. Extracurricular learning trajectories effectively compensate for the limited number of teaching hours in chemistry, providing a deeper understanding and application of knowledge.
Keywords: 
educational environment; system of secondary vocational education; digital laboratories and microscopy; curricular and extracurricular trajectories
Please register
References: 

1. Robert, I. V., 2022. Development of education informatization in the context of digital transformation. Pedagogy, no. 86 (1), pp. 40–50. (In Russ.)
2. Robert, I. V., Shikhnabieva, T. Sh., Kastornova, V. A., Kozlov, O. A., Polyakov, V. P., Mukhametzyanov, I. Sh., 2022. International experience in the application of digital technologies in the activities of general education organizations. Pedagogical Informatics, no. 1, pp. 75–92. (In Russ.)
3. Abduazimova-Ozsuylu, L. A., Mukhtorova, M. M., Abduazimov, A. A., Khanazarov, D. A., Mazifarova, K. R., 2021. Issues of innovative education in medicine. Bulletin of Science and Education, no. 15-2 (118), pp. 50–56. (In Russ.)
4. Apatova, N. V., 1994. Information technologies in school education. Moscow: IOSH, RAS, 228 p. (In Russ.)
5. Arbozova, E. N., Usoltseva, L. V., 2010. Design and application of learning tools for methodological training of biology students in the information-subject environment of a university: monograph. Omsk: Publishing House of OmSPU, 162 p. (In Russ.)
6. Vaindorf-Sysoeva, M. E., Subocheva, M. L., 2020. Digital learning in the context of modern education: practice of application. Moscow: Diona LLC, 244 p. (In Russ.)
7. Robert, I. V., 2020. Digital transformation of education: challenges and opportunities for improvement. Informatization of Education and Science, no. 3 (47), pp. 3–16. (In Russ.)
8. Mashbits, E. I., 1986. Computerization of education: Problems and prospects. Moscow: Znanie, 80 p. (In Russ.)
9. Pasechnik, V. V., 1994. Theory and practice of organizing educational and extracurricular activities of students in the process of teaching biology. Abstract Dr. Sci. (Pedagogical). Moscow, 268 p. (In Russ.)
10. Corrigan, D., 2006. No wonder kids are confused: The relevance of science education to science. Paper presented at the ACER Annual Research Conference “Boosting Science Learning-What Will It Take?”. Canberra, Australia. Available at: http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2006/ (In Eng.)
11. Ben-David Kolikant, Y., 2010. Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the Internet influenced their ability to learn. Computers in Human Behavior, no. 26 (6), pp. 1384–1391. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563210000889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.012 (In Eng.)
12. DeCoito, I., 2020. The use of digital technologies to enhance learners’ conceptions of nature of science. McComas, W. F. (ed.) Nature of Science in Science Instruction. Science: Philosophy, History and Education. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_19. (In Eng.)
13. Kodzhaspirova, G. M., Petrov, K. V., 2008. Technical teaching aids and methods of their use: textbook for students of higher educational institutions. 5th ed. Moscow: Akademiya Publishing Center, 352 p. (In Russ.)
14. Voronin, Yu. A., Chudinsky, R. M., Bovin, I. T., Sakharov, Yu. E., 2000. Modern educational physical experiment: textbook. Voronezh: Voronezh State Pedagogical University Publishing House, 295 p. (In Russ.)
15. Volkova, S. A., Gusev, S. N., 2010. On the use of a digital laboratory. Chemistry in School, no. 6, pp. 64–67. (In Russ.)
16. Zimina, A. I., 2012. Methodology for the effective use of digital laboratories in chemistry lessons in secondary schools: abstract Cand. Sci. (Pedagogical). Moscow, 21 p. (In Russ.)
17. Klevitsky, V. V., 1999. Educational physical experiment using a computer as a means of individualizing education in school: abstract Cand. Sci. (Pedagogical). Moscow, 16 p. (In Russ.)
18. Nazarova, A. G., 2003. Organization of a demonstration chemical experiment using information technology tools: abstract Cand. Sci. (Pedagogical). Moscow, 21 p. (In Russ.)
19. Starovikov, M. I., 2006. Teaching students the experimental method in the physics course using a computer: monograph. Biysk State Pedagogical University named after V. M. Shukshin. Biysk: YGPU Publ., 264 p. (In Russ.)
20. Zhilyin, D. M., 2006. Practicum L-Micro: Student’s Guide. Moscow: MGIU Publ., 322 p. (In Russ.)
21. Chudinsky, R. M., 2006. On the issue of computerization of educational experiments. Science and Education, no. 6, pp. 69–71. (In Russ.)
22. Zimina, A. I., Bespalov, P. I., Dorofeev, M. V., 2010. Use of digital laboratories in demonstration experiments. Chemistry in School, no. 10, pp. 59–66. (In Russ.)
23. Bespalov, P. I., Dorofeev, M. V., Zhilyin, D. M., Zimina, A. I., Orzhekovsky, P. A., 2014. Use of digital laboratories in chemistry education in secondary school. Moscow: BINOM, Laboratory of Knowledge, 229 p. (In Russ.)
24. Bespalov, P. I., Dorofeev, M. V., 2021. Implementation of educational programs in natural sciences and technology in chemistry using “Growth Point” center equipment (methodological guide). Moscow, 155 p. (In Russ.)
25. Vdovina, S. V., Grigorieva, O. S., 2014. Application of digital laboratories in studying general chemistry disciplines at the university. Bulletin of Kazan Technological University, no. 5, pp. 300–302. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/primenenie-tsifrovyh-laboratoriy-pri-i... (accessed: 02.08.2024).
26. Sharipova, N. V., Solovyeva, A. L., Batenova, Y. A., 2023. Use of digital sensors in studying general chemistry at the university. Modern High-Tech Technologies, no. 11, pp. 230–234. Available at: https://top-technologies.ru/ru/article/view?id=39849 (accessed: 02.08.2024). (In Russ.)
27. Aleksandrova, E. V., 2024. Studying organic acids using a digital pH sensor. Chemistry in School, no. 2, pp. 66–73. (In Russ.)
28. Borunova, E. B., 2022. From the experience of using digital laboratories. Chemistry in School, no. 6, pp. 66–71. (In Russ.)
29. Vsyakikh, M. V., 2023. Digital laboratory in school chemistry lessons as a means of increasing students’ cognitive activity. Scientific Horizons, no. 9 (73), pp. 4–8. (In Russ.)
30. Feoktistov, A. V., Fedorov, V. A., Andryukhina, L. M. [et al.], ed., 2023. Professional and Pedagogical Education: Scientific Search and Solutions of the 21st Century. Ekaterinburg: Russian State Professional-Pedagogical University Publishing House, 167 p. (In Russ.)
31. Tropnikova, V. V., Khomchenko, A. S., 2024. Chemistry Practicum. Novosibirsk, 197 p. (In Russ.)
32. Volkova, S. A., Pustovit, S. O., 2022. Drawbacks and advantages of using the digital laboratory AFS in teaching chemistry in secondary school. Pedagogue and Digital Education. Moscow: Green Print LLC, 84 p. (In Russ.)