Error message

Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in mayo_preprocess_node() (line 360 of /var/www/sp-journal.ru/sites/sp-journal.ru/themes/mayo/template.php).
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2501.03
UDC: 
159.9+373
Sadovnikova Zh. V.
Кандидат педагогических наук, Deputy President, Russian Academy of Education, sadzanna@mail.ru, Moscow

School Readiness for the Prevention of Destructive Behavior in Adolescents

Abstract: 
Prevention of destructive behavior of adolescents carried out in schools is a complex process that requires consistency, involvement of specialists, parents of students (legal representatives), and the administration of the educational organization. A large place in the prevention of destructive behavior of adolescents at school is given to educational and psychological-pedagogical work. The purpose of the article is to analyze the readiness of the school to prevent destructive behavior of adolescents. Methodology. As a methodological base, a systemic approach, an environmental approach, and a methodology of pedagogical design in terms of the conditions for the development of self-awareness and self-control were used. Research results: analysis of the work. The effectiveness of preventive work will depend on the selected forms and methods of preventive diagnostics (within the framework of psychological-pedagogical and educational work). The system of preventive work in an educational organization requires the presence of mandatory blocks in its composition, which are implemented in stages: target; organizational; diagnostic, substantive. Conclusion. It is concluded that the readiness of the school to prevent destructive behavior of adolescents depends on many factors and is the result of a lot of joint work of all participants in educational relations. A great deal of attention is given to the role of the educational psychologist, who can identify the first signs of destruction in a student’s behavior at an early stage, as well as organize work aimed at correcting behavior.
Keywords: 
prevention; destructive behavior; educational psychologist; diagnostic methods; educational work; psychological and pedagogical work
Please register
References: 

1. Rean, A. A., 2015. Risk factors for deviant behavior: family context. National Psychological Journal, no. 4 (20), pp. 105–110 (In Russ.)
2. Vakorina, L. Yu., Vasyagina, N. N., Gerasimenko, Yu. A., Pestova, I. V., 2018. Methodological recommendations for educational organizations for determining the conditions of individual preventive work for students with deviant behavior. Moscow: FGBNU “Center for the Protection of Children’s Rights and Interests”, 41 p. (In Russ.)
3. Kuzmina, N. E., 2010. Art therapy as a means of correcting personal qualities that determine the deviant behavior of adolescents. Humanitarian vector, no. 1, pp. 87–91. (In Russ.)
4. Oferkina, O. A., 2019. Social and psychological prevention of antisocial behavior of adolescent groups: abstract Cand. Sci. (Psychol.) Moscow, 205 p. (In Russ.)
5. Gaponova, S. A., Devet’yarova, I. N., 2020. Correction of deviant behavior of adolescents in extracurricular activities. Man. Crime and Punishment, no. 3, T. 28 (1-4), pp. 462–473 (In Russ.)
6. Gatal’sky, V. D., 2011. The system of pedagogical propaedeutics of deviant behavior of student youth: abstract Dr. Sci. (Pedag.). St. Petersburg, 2011. (In Russ.)
7. Methodological recommendations for the implementation of modern methods in the field of prevention of destructive behavior of adolescents and young people in the practice of educational organizations (based on the developments of Russian scientists) [online]. Available at: https://fioco.ru/ (In Russ.)
8. Alekhina, S. V., Delibalt, V. V., Dvoryanchikov, N. V. et al., 2017. Methodological recommendations for organizing the examination of children and adolescents with behavioral disorders. Moscow: FGBOU VO MGPPU, 60 p. (In Russ.)
9. Belayneh, A. B., Misganaw, Alene & Getu Shiferaw, 2024. Antecedents and prevalence of destructive leadership behavior: the case in primary and middle level schools. Education, no. 3-13. DOI: 10.1080/03004279.2024.2367553. (In Eng.)
10. Temesgen, B. E. & Melaku Mengistu Gebremeskel, 2024. The prevalence and effect of destructive leadership behavior on teachers’ organizational commitment in the post-COVID-19 period: a case study of secondary schools in Amhara Regional State. Cogent Education, no. 11:1. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2392426 (In Eng.)
11. Grill, M., Pousette, A., and Björnsdotter, A., 2023. Managerial behavioral training for functional leadership: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, no. 1–27. DOI: 10.1080/01608061.2023.2171174 (In Eng.)
12. Methodological recommendations for the system of functioning of psychological services in general education organizations: approved. By Order of the Ministry of Education of Russia dated 12/28/2020 No. R-193 [online]. Available at: https://rospsy.ru/sites/default/files/2021-04/Распо-ряжение%20Минпросвещения%20России%20от%2028.12.2020%20N%20Р-193%20%20Об%20%285%29%20%281%29.pdf (In Russ.)