DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2501.15
UDC: 
801.6+82.085
Tripolskaya Tatiana A.
Доктор филологических наук, Prof., Prof. of the Department Chair of Modern Russian Language, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, tr_tatiana@mail.ru, Novosibirsk
Matkhanova Irina Petrovna
Доктор филологических наук, Professor of the Department of Modern Russian language and its teaching methods, Novosibirsk state pedagogical university, matkhanova@mail.ru, Novosibirsk

“The Interpretation Potential of the Language System and the Creative Activity of the Speaker”: substantive and structural characteristics of the Scientific school in the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University

Abstract: 
The studies, united by a common theme, are aimed at examining the correlation of the interpretative possibilities of the language system and the creative activity of the speakers, which means switching attention from the reflective nature of the language to the ways of linguistic representation of meaning. The focus is either a person interpreting received messages, as well as reflecting on their own and others’ speech, or the interpretative potential of the language, or the event of an objective world that can be represented in one way or another. The basis for interpretative studies is the results of structural and system descriptions: a system of varying linguistic units of different levels, connected by different types of relations, characterized by uniqueness / polysemy, marked / unmarked, usuality / occasionality. This model of the linguistic system is also a tool for the interpretation activity of both the native speaker and the researcher. On the same foundation, typological studies are based on both the identification of linguistic universals and the specifics of the languages being compared. Interpretative paradigm makes it possible to naturally combine the study of the lexical and grammatical possibilities of the language in their interaction.
Keywords: 
scientific school; interpretation; interpretation potential of the language system; communicative activity of the speaker; objects of interpretation; types and modes of interpretation
References: 

1. Bulygina, E. Yu., Tripolskaya, T. A., 2019. Logical and mythological bases of metaphor as an object of description in the dictionary of the active type. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series: Philology, no. 2, pp. 127–141. (In Russ.)
2. Linguistic identity in the interpretive research (On the 85th Anniversary of Yu. N. Karaulov’s Birth). Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2021, 372 p.
3. Chumakov, Ju. N., 2001. Foreword. Problems of interpretation in linguistics and literary criticism. Materials of the First Philological Conference dedicated to the 65th anniversary of the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University. Novosibirsk: Publ. of the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, pp. 3–7 (In Russ.)
4. Gumboldt, V., 1984. Selected works on linguistics. Moscow: Progress Publ., 400 p. (In Russ.)
5. Matkhanova, I. P., Tripolskaya, T. A., 2019. Scientific school “Interpretive potential of the language system and creative activity of the speaker” at the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 9. Philology, no. 2, pp. 127–141. (In Russ.)
6. Karaulov, Yu. N., 2010. The Russian language and Linguistic Identity. Moscow: LKI, URSS Editorial Publ., 261 p. (In Russ.)
7. Demyankov, V. Z., 1989. Interpretation, understanding and linguistic aspects of computer modeling. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ., 84 p. (In Russ.)
8. Leontyeva, K. I., 2017. Anthropocentric (subject-oriented) modeling of (literary) translating: a Cognitive Semiotics perspective. Cognitive studies of language, vol. XVIII. Anthropocentric nature of language. Tambov: Tambov State University Publ., pp. 377–409. (In Russ.)
9. Sonesson, G., 2014. Translation and Other Acts of Meaning: In Between Cognitive Semiotics and Semiotics of Culture. Cognitive Semiotics, vol. 7 (2), pp. 249–280. (In Eng.)
10. Vezhbitskaya, A., 1978. Metatext in the text. New in foreign linguistics. Мoscow: Progress Publ., issue. 8. Linguistics of the text, pp. 402–421. (In Russ.)
11. Vinokur, T. G., 1993. Speaker and listener: variants of speech behavior. Moscow: Science Publ., 171 p. (In Russ.)
12. Lyapon, M. V., 1989. Evaluation situation and verbal modeling. Language and Identity. Moscow: Science Publ., pp. 24–34 (In Russ.)
13. Bondarko, A. V., 2002. Theory of meaning in the system of functional grammar (on the material of the Russian language). Moscow: Languages of slavic culture Publ., 736 p. (In Russ.)
14. Boldyrev, N. N., 2014. Interpretation of the world and world knowledge in language. Cognitive studies of language, vol. XIX. Cognitive variation in linguistic interpretation of the world. Moscow, Tambov: Tambov State University Publ., pp. 20–28. (In Russ.)
15. Chafe, W., 1983. The recall and verbalization of past experience. The New in foreign linguistics. Moscow: Raduga Publ., 1983, issue 12. Applied Linguistics, pp. 35–73 (In Russ.)
16. Lyon, G., 1999. Language and perceptual experience. Philosophy, vol. 74, no. 290, pp. 515–534. (In Eng.)
17. Matkhanova, I. P., Tripolskaya, T. A, 1994. The Interpretational Component in Language and Creative Activity. The Linguistic Identity: problem of choice and interpretation of linguistic sign in the text. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., pp. 115–123. (In Russ.)
18. Matkhanova, I. P., Tripolskaya, T. A., 2009. Lacunarity in the system of emotive means of language (language situation of emotion of surprise). Lacunarity in language, world picture, dictionary and text. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., pp. 6–16 (In Russ.)
19. Demyankov, V. Z., 1994. Cognitive linguistics as a kind of the interpreting approach. Questions of linguistics, no. 4, pp. 17–33. (In Russ.)
20. Cognitive studies of language, vol. XIX. Cognitive variation in linguistic interpretation of the world. Moscow, Tambov: Tambov State University Publ., 2014, 584 p. (In Russ.)
21. Matkhanova, I. P., Tripolskaya, T. A., 2004. Interpretational aspects of lin guistics: problems and ways of research. Problems of interpretational linguistics: interpreters and types of interpretation. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., pp. 6–19 (in Russ.)
22. Matkhanova, I. P., Tripolskaya, T. A., 2005. Problems of interpretation studies: types and modes of interpretation. Moscow University Bulletin. Philology Series, Issue 5, pp. 88–105 (In Russ.)
23. Through “Alien” to “Our Own”: Dialogue of Russian and Hungarian Cultures. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2023, 240 p. (In Russ.)