DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2502.04
UDC: 
378.147.88
Khorokhordina Elena
Senior Lecturer of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, len.nogteva@yandex.ru, Novosibirsk

Resilience and Vitality as Pedagogical Categories

Abstract: 
One of the most important characteristics of an adolescent’s personality becomes the development of personal resources that contribute to success in a constantly changing world. The complex of issues related to the process, ability or result of successful human adaptation despite difficult or threatening circumstances is considered in the theory and practice of education in the concepts of “resilience”, “sustainability”, “vitality”, “life creativity”. The purpose of the article is to characterize the concepts of “resilience” as pedagogical categories to substantiate theoretical approaches to understanding the development of personal resources that contribute to the successful adaptation of an adolescent. Methodology and research methods. The methodological bases of the study are determined by subject-personal, axiological, comparative-pedagogical approaches, which reveal the key features of the concept of “resilience”. Results of the study. In order to clarify the correlation between resilience as pedagogical categorie, a comparative analysis of more than 30 works by Western European, American and Australian researchers was conducted according to the following criteria: approaches, meaning of the term, structure, diagnostic methods. No significant substantive differences in the interpretation of the concepts of “resilience” were found. The application of these concepts as pedagogical categories should take into account the context of the approach, which sets the meaningful and structural characteristics of the concept. Conclusion. Thanks to the clarification of the concepts of “resilience” as pedagogical categories, it is possible to define more substantively the psychological and pedagogical conditions for the formation of resilience in the educational system of an educational organization.
Keywords: 
resilience; educational system of school; social education; value attitudes of personality
Please register
References: 

1. Romm, T. A., 2007. Social education: evolution of theoretical images. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 380 p. (In Russ.)
2. Bochkareva, T. N., 2023. Factors of formation of individual resilience (viability) of basic school students. Actual issues of humanities and social sciences: from theory to practice: materials of the II All-Russian scientific-practical conference with international participation. Cheboksary: Sreda Publ., pp. 32–33. (In Russ.)
3. Selivanova, O. A., Bystrova, N. V., Derecha, I. I., Mamontova, T. S., Panfilova, O. V., 2020. Study of the phenomenon of resistance: problems and prospects. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, no. 3, vol. 8, p. 72 (In Russ.)
4. Howard, S., Dryden, J., Johnson, B., 1998. Childhood resilience: review and critique of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 307–323 (In Eng.)
5. Makhnach, A. V., 2017. Human vitality as a subject of study in psychological science. Psychological Journal, vol. 38. no. 4, pp. 5–16. (In Russ.)
6. Polonsky, V. M., 2017. Conceptual and terminological apparatus of pedagogy and education. Scientific result. Pedagogy and psychology of education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 54–60. (In Russ.)
7. Mudrik, A. V., 2004. Human socialization: textbook for university students. Moscow: Academy, 304 p. (In Russ.)
8. Wichert, K., 2018. Waldorf School. Moscow: Enigma Publ., 144 p. (In Russ.)
9. Benard, B., 1993. Resiliency requires changing hearts and minds. Western Center News, vol. 62, pp. 27–29 (In Eng.)
10. Dryden, J., Johnson, B. R., Howard, S., McGuire, A., 1998. Resiliency: A comparison arising from conversations with 9–12 year old children and their teachers. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego CA (In Eng.)
11. Garmezy, N., 1993. Resiliency and vulnerability to adverse development outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 416–430 (In Eng.)
12. Aleksandrova, L. A., 2005. Toward understanding the concept of “personality vitality” in the context of the problems of psychology of abilities. Psychology of Abilities: Current State and Prospects of Research: Proceedings of the Scientific Conference. Moscow, pp. 16–21. (In Russ.)
13. Chuprakova, A. A., Shamardina, M. V., 2019. Factors of resilience of employees of the Ministry of Emergency Situations. Bulletin of psychology and pedagogy of Altai State University, no. 4, pp. 121–128. (In Russ.)
14. Muzaleva, D. A., 2022. Professional resilience of a teacher as a special case of personality resilience. Mir nauki. Pedagogy and psychology, vol. 10, no. 3. URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/43PDMN322.pdf (In Russ.)
15. Grishina, E. V., 2021. Features of teenagers’ resilience. Young Scientist, no. 41 (383), pp. 288–290. (In Russ.)
16. Kalashnikova, M. B., Nikitina, E. V., 2017. Resilience as a necessary personal characteristic of modern adolescents. Vestnik of Novgorod State University, no. 4 (102), pp. 51–55. (In Russ.)
17. Knizhnikova, S. V., 2005. Pedagogical prevention of suicidal behavior on the basis of the formation of resilience of adolescents in the conditions of secondary school. Krasnodar, 26 p. (In Russ.)
18. Markelova, T. V., Shutkina, J. A., Semonyuk, A. M., 2022. Vital stability and Volitional self-regulation of cadet corps pupils and students of general education schools. Scientific Opinion, no. 5, pp. 64–72. (In Russ.)
19. Volodina, T. В., 2011. The relationship between resilience and emotional burnout in teachers of secondary schools. Modern Problems of Science and Education, no. 6, pp. 259–260. (In Russ.)
20. Hellerstein, D., 2011. How can I become resilient? Heal Your Brain. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 382 p. (In Eng.)
21. Ananyev, B. G., 2016. Man as a subject of cognition. St. Peterburg: Peter Publ., 288 p. (Series: Masters of Psychology) (In Russ.)
22. Linquanti, R., 1992. Using Community-Wide Collaboration To Foster Resiliency in Kids: A Conceptual Framework. Washington D. C., 17 p. (In Eng.)
23. Muller, V. K., 2023. English-Russian dictionary. Moscow: AST Publ., 800 p. (In Russ.)
24. Apresyan, Yu. D., Mednikova, E. M., Petrova, A. V., 2001. New large English-Russian dictionary. Moscow: Russian language, 2490 p. (In Russ.)
25. Maddi, S. R., Harvey, R. H., 2005. Hardiness condidered across cultures. Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping. New York: Springer, pp. 409–426. (In Eng.)
26. Jefferies, P., McGarrigle, L., Ungar, M., 2018. The CYRM-R: A Rasch-Validated Revision of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, vol. 16 (1), pp. 1–23. (In Eng.)
27. Valieva, F. I., 2014. Resiliency as a factor of socio-professional adaptation. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Education: psychological and pedagogical research, ser. 12, vol. 2, pp. 39–50. (In Russ.)
28. Leontiev, D. A., Rasskazova, E. I., 2006. Test of viability. Moscow: Slym Publ., 63 p. (In Russ.)
29. Vodopyanova, N. E., 2009. Psychodiagnostics of stress. St. Peterburg: Peter Publ., 336 p. (In Russ.)
30. Leontiev, D. A., 2000. Test of sense-life orientations (SZHO). Moscow: Smasl Publ., 18 p. (In Russ.)
31. Khorokhordina, E. Е., 2024. Features of the educational system in a resistant school. Russian and foreign practices of increasing the resistance of educational organizations: materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kazan, pp. 244–247. (In Russ.)