DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2502.08
UDC: 
376.5+373.3/.5+159.928
Nekrasova Irina Ivanovna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, irinanekrasova@mail.ru, Novosibirsk

Opportunities to Identify and Develop the Individual Abilities of Gifted Students in Modern Technological Education

Abstract: 
Introduction. The article is devoted to the solution of the problem of identifying and developing individual abilities of gifted students in modern technological education in the context of extracurricular activities and additional education. Focusing on the state significance of the problem of developing the abilities of students in technological education, the need to implement comprehensive work with capable students and the insufficiency of methodological development in this area, the purpose of this article was designated to theoretically substantiate the possibilities of identifying and developing individual abilities of gifted students in modern technological education. Methodology and research methods. When writing the article, the following methods were used: analysis of domestic and foreign scientific literature on the problem of identifying and developing students’ abilities. The works of theoretical directions in the study of the problem of giftedness were studied: D. B. Bogoyavlenskaya, L. S. Vygotsky, V. V. Davydov, J. Renzulli, P. Torrens, F. Galton, M. S. Egorova, T. M. Maryutina and others. Results of the study. To identify the potential abilities of gifted children, the spatial concept of R. V. Komarov was adopted. It most fully and at the same time succinctly reveals the structure of the phenomenon of giftedness, and includes a component of potential giftedness. The main problems of identifying abilities are associated with the multifaceted nature and complexity of the phenomenon of giftedness itself. The theoretical conclusions made as a result of the work suggest a shift in emphasis in the existing curriculum in favor of the individualization of educational programs. They also open up new opportunities for the use of such programs in the future and will be useful for teachers of schools and organizations of additional education, working on the development of students’ abilities, both as methodological support and as training materials for advanced training of labor (technology) teachers. Conclusion. In conclusion, it is concluded that an integrated approach to identifying children’s giftedness in the context of modern technological education is a complex process that requires taking into account many factors and conditions. It is aimed at creating a favorable environment for the learning and development of all students. To develop this approach, the main existing methods of diagnosing giftedness were considered, such as: observation, psychological research, test methods, experiment, identification of giftedness through competitive events, expert assessment.
Keywords: 
giftedness; factors of giftedness; classification of types of giftedness; phenomenon of giftedness; integrated approach; methods of giftedness diagnostics
Please register
References: 

1. Ignatieva, O. V., Lysenko, O. V., Chernikova, I. Yu., 2015. Tutor support as a factor of socialization of gifted children: monograph. Perm: Pushka Publishing House, 134 p. (In Russ.)
2. Stern, V., 1997. Mental giftedness: Psychological methods of testing mental giftedness in their application to school-age children. St. Petersburg: Soyuz Publ., 398 p. (In Russ.)
3. Bogoyavlenskaya, D. B., Brushlinsky, A. V., Kholodnaya, M. A., Shadrikov, V. D. [et al.], 2003. The working concept of giftedness, 2nd ed. Moscow: ICP Magister Publ., 90 p. (In Russ.)
4. Vygotsky, L. S., 1991. Imagination and creativity in childhood: a psychological essay: a book for teachers. 3rd edition. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ., 93 p. (In Russ.)
5. Davydov, V. V., 1996. Theory of developmental learning. Moscow: INTOR Publ., 544 p. (In Russ.)
6. Renzulli, J. S., 1986. The threering conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. R. I. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (eds.). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge: Cambr. Univ. Press, pp. 53–92. (In Eng.)
7. Torrence, E. P., 1980. Growing up creatively gifted: a 22-year longitudinal study. Creative child and adul quatery, no. 5, pp. 148–170. (In Eng.)
8. Galton, F., 1996. The inheritance of talent. Laws and consequences. Moscow: Mysl Publ., 272 p. (In Russ.)
9. Egorova, M. S., 2014. The study of development in the psychology of individual differences. Psychological research, vol. 7, no. 36, p. 12. (In Russ.)
10. Binet, A., Simon, T., 1923. Methods of measuring mental giftedness: A collection of articles / Translated by E. Elstein; Edited by S. L. Rubinstein. Kharkov: State Publishing House of Ukraine, 178 p. (In Russ.)
11. Eysenck, G., 2000. How to measure personality. Moscow: Kogito-Center Publ., 205 p. (In Russ.)
12. Wexler, D. D., 2000. Wexler’s test “Diagnostics of the structure of intelligence: adult option 2: methodological guide. St. Petersburg: IMATON Publ., 112 p. (In Russ.)
13. Druzhinin, V. N., Bogoyavlenskaya, D. B., Babaeva, Yu. D., 2017. Psychology of giftedness and creativity. Monograph. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 288 p. (In Russ.)
14. Ilyin, E. P., 2009. Psychology of creativity, creativity, giftedness. St. Petersburg: Peter Publ., 448 p. (In Russ.)
15. Bogoyavlenskaya, D. B., Brushlinsky, A. V., Kholodnaya, M. A., Shadrikov, V. D. [et al.], 2003. The working concept of giftedness, 2nd ed. Moscow: ICP Magister Publ., 90 p. (In Russ.)
16. Komarov, R. V., 2017. Psychological 3D model of giftedness. Psychology of giftedness and creativity: monograph. St. Petersburg: LLC “Nestor-Istoriya” Publ., pp. 113–125. (In Russ.)
17. Gardner, G., 2007. Structure of the mind: theory of multiple intelligence: translated from English Moscow: LLC “I. D. Williams” Publ., 512 p. (In Russ.)