DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2503.09
UDC: 
377.8
Leushkanova O. Yu.
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Teacher Training of Vocational Training and Subject Methods, South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, Director, Magnitogorsk Pedagogical College, Leushkan62@mail.ru, Magnitogorsk

Nuclear Approach to Modeling of Professional Digital Culture of Pedagogue

Abstract: 
The article discusses the idea of creating a nuclear model of professional and digital culture of teachers. Goal. This article describes the modeling of a teacher’s professional digital culture in a virtual environment of continuing teacher education. Methodology. Currently, there are a number of problems related to the formation of a teacher’s professional digital culture; there is no generally accepted definition, clear evaluation criteria and a general understanding of the structure of this concept; there is a gap between technological capabilities and teachers’ willingness to use them; many teachers experience difficulties using digital tools, lack knowledge and skills, and also experience resistance to introduce new technologies into their work; the lack of an integrated system for the formation and development of a teacher’s professional and digital culture; еducational institutions lack a systematic approach to teaching teachers how to work with digital technologies, and teachers are not motivated enough to master digital technologies; teachers do not see the obvious advantages of using digital tools, do not feel supported by the administration, and do not have the opportunity to share experiences with colleagues. Solving the above-mentioned problems and developing a model of a teacher’s professional and digital culture is an important and urgent task that requires an integrated approach that includes both theoretical research and practical implementation in an educational institution. The successful formation of a teacher’s professional and digital culture will be the key to successful digital transformation of education and improvement of its quality. One of the modern methodological approaches used in the research is the nuclear approach, which provides a structured and focused approach to the organization of a virtual environment of continuing teacher education and its effectiveness, which in turn facilitates the development of tools for monitoring and evaluating a teacher’s professional digital culture. The result of the research in the field of the formation of professional and digital culture of a teacher was the application of the nuclear model as a useful tool for further assessment and selection of methods for the development of professional and digital culture of teachers.
Keywords: 
modeling; nuclear model of professional and digital culture; core; protective belt; components of professional and digital culture; continuing pedagogical education
References: 

1. Weindorf-Sysoeva, M. E., 2009. The organization of a virtual educational environment in the training of teaching staff for innovation. Moscow, 50 p. (In Russ.)
2. Vasiliev, Yu. V., 1990. Pedagogical management at school: methodology, theory, practice. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., 143 p. (In Russ.)
3. Vershlovsky, S. G., 2008. Continuous education: a historical and theoretical analysis of the phenomenon. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences. postgraduate education, 151 p. (In Russ.)
4. Vladislavlev, A. P., 1978. Continuing education: Problems and prospects. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya Publ., 175 p. (In Russ.)
5. Gershunsky, B. S., 1987. Prospects for the development of a unified system of continuing education. Moscow: NIOP Publ., 41 p. (In Russ.)
6. Dolgova, V. I., 2010. Acmeological problems of the development of innovative culture of subjects of the professional education system. Scientific research in education, no. 11, pp. 16–23. (In Russ.)
7. Zagvyazinsky, V. I., 2019. Methodology of pedagogical research. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House, 105 p. (In Russ.)
8. Ilyina, N. F., 2020. Professional development of a teacher in the context of digital transformation: a vector of changes. Professional education in Russia and abroad, no. 3 (39), pp. 69–73. (In Russ.)
9. Krivolapova, L. V., 2005. Innovative pedagogical system of professional training of specialists in the conditions of the college-university educational complex. Abstract Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Tambov, 28 p. (In Russ.)
10. Kuzmina, N. V., Pautova, L. E., Zharinova, E. N., 2018. Acmeology – the foundations of teacher professionalism in the 21st century. St. Petersburg: Publishing House NU «Center for Strategic Studies». (In Russ.)
11. Markova, A. K., 1993. Psychology of teacher labor. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ., 192 p. (In Russ.)
12. Novikov, A. M., Novikov, D. A., 2010.The structure of the system theory of professional education development. EGVES Publishing House, 218 p. (In Russ.)
13. Zagvyazinsky, V. I., Zakirova, A. F., 2008. Pedagogical dictionary. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 352 p. (In Russ.)
14. Pivovarov, D. V., 1986. Problems of the ideal image carrier: an operational aspect. Sverdlovsk: Ural University Publishing House, 129 p. (In Russ.)
15. Rakitov, A. I., 1994. A new approach to the interrelation of history, information and culture: the example of Russia. Questions of Philosophy, no. 4, pp. 14–34. (In Russ.)
16. Slastenin, V. A., 2000. Pedagogical process as a system. Moscow: MAGISTER-PRESSE Publ., 488 p. (In Russ.)
17. Solomko, L. I., 1998. Pedagogical conditions of continuous education of higher school teachers. Abstract Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Kazan, 171 p. (In Russ.)
18. Subocheva, M. L., 2013. Prospects for the development of postgraduate pedagogical education for teachers of diverse training in secondary vocational education. Abstract Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Moscow, 40 p. (In Russ.)
19. Surtaeva, N. N., 2025. Pedagogical technologies: a textbook for undergraduate and graduate studies [online]. Available at: https://urait.ru/bco de/429978 (Accesseb 24 March 2025). (In Russ.)
20. Uvarina, N. V., 2012. The core of the pedagogical concept: patterns, principles of actualizing the creative potential of students in the educational process. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Education. Pedagogical sciences, no. 4 (263), pp. 34–37. (In Russ.)
21. Uvarina, N. V., Savchenkov, A. V., Leushkanova, O. Yu., 2024. The current state of the problem of the organization of the virtual secondary pedagogical education. Innovative processes in higher and secondary vocational education and professional selfdetermination. Moscow: EkonInform Publishing House, 378 c. (In Russ.)
22. Tsiring, R. A., 1999. The focus of management on the continuity of professional and pedagogical education of students. Abstract Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Chelyabinsk, 24 p. (In Russ.)
23. Shumakova, O. A., 2011. Development of the basic culture of interaction be-tween an educational psychologist and parents. Abstract Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Yekaterinburg, 48 p. (In Russ.)
24. Tyack, David B., 1974. The one best system: A history of American urban education. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 168 p. (Abstract in Eng.)
25. Kim, K. Y., Pathak, S., Werner, S., 2015. When do international human capital enhancing practices benefit the bottom line? An ability, motivation, and opportunity perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, no. 46 (7), pp. 784–805. (Abstract in Eng.)