UDC: 
37.018
Yang Yujin
raduate Student, Department of Decorative Arts and Crafts, Institute of Fine Arts, Moscow Pedagogical State University, yangyujin@mail.ru, Moscow
Tkalich Svetlana K.
Department of Decorative Arts and Artistic Crafts, Institute of Fine Arts, Moscow State Pedagogical University, amguema2026@mail.ru, Moscow

Syncretic Thinking as a Methodological Resource for Art Education Based on a Theoretical Model and Implementation Principles

Abstract: 
Abstract. The article foregrounds the challenge of ensuring the integrity of art education within an increasingly complex media environment and substantiates the necessity of syncretic thinking as a foundation that integrates intellectual, embodied-aesthetic, and creative practices. The aim of the article is to provide a theoretical justification of syncretic thinking as a methodological resource for art education and to identify its role in shaping a holistic pedagogical process that brings together art, science, and technological practices. The methodology rests on an interdisciplinary approach (philosophy of art, cognitive psychology, aesthetics) and includes comparative-analytical and hermeneutic analysis of scholarly texts, as well as pedagogical modeling; the source base comprises contemporary studies on syncretism in art, the dialogue of artistic paradigms, and art pedagogy. The research results show that applying the principles of syncretic thinking in educational modules ensures the integration of diverse forms of knowledge and experience, strengthens learners’ creative potential, fosters intercultural communication skills, and develops holistic artistic perception. In conclusion, syncretic thinking is argued to be a methodological resource that lends art education an innovative and resilient character in the post-digital era, uniting emotional, intellectual, and embodied practices within a single educational space.
Keywords: 
Keywords: syncretism; art education; creativity; interdisciplinarity; cognitive practices
References: 

1. Savoie, A., 2017. Aesthetic experience and creativity in arts education: Ehrenzweig and the primal syncretistic perception of the child. Cambridge Journal of Education, Т. 47, no. 1, pp. 53–66 (In Eng.)
2. Maggio, T. A., 2023. Framework for syncretic pluriversal narrative: somaesthetics and consciousness in Thai design education: abstract. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24382/5082 (In Eng.)
3. Gregory, E., Volk, D., Long, S., 2013. Guest editors’ introduction: Syncretism and syncretic literacies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, Т. 13, no. 3, pp. 309–321 (In Eng.)
4. Ascott, R., 2008. Pixels and Particles: The path to syncretism. Educating Artists for the Future: Learning at the Intersections of Art,47 p. (In Eng.)
5. Templeman, M. R., 1983. Educating for cross-cultural syncretism through the arts: abstract. (In Eng.)
6. Ji, J., 2020. The Practical Dimension of Syncretic Thinking of “Intelligence and Education”. 2020 Conference on Education, Language and Inter-Cultural Communication (ELIC 2020). Atlantis Press, pp. 283–287 (In Eng.)
7. Gordin, A. I., 2014. The Art of Thinking: Educational and Methodological Guide. Irkutsk: VSGAO Publ., 312 p. (In Russ.)
8. Medkova, E. S., 2009. How to Awaken the Artist in a Child: Modern Technologies for Developing Creative Abilities Based on the Archetypes of Art. Professional Development Courses. Lectures 1-4. Educational and Methodological Guide. Moscow, Pedagogical University “First of September”, 52 p. (In Russ.)
9. Neiding, V. L., 1983. On the Origins of Primitive Syncretic Consciousness and the Beginnings of Art: abstract, 18 p. (In Russ.)
10. Syncretic thinking. Encyclopedia of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Available at: https://epistemology_of_science.academic.ru/457 (In Russ.)
11. Jiang, Taijun, Jin, Xuehua, 2021. Research on Interdisciplinary Integration Strategies for Art and Design Professional Training. University, no. 2, pp. 72–73. (In Chinese)
12. Song, Xiaozhen, 2021. Research on Interdisciplinary Integration Education in Art and Design. Literature and Educational Materials, no. 23, pp. 78–81. (In Chinese)
13. Li, Yanni, 2024. Research on Teaching Strategies for Art and Design Basics Integrating Outstanding Traditional Chinese Culture with Creative Thinking. Teacher, no. 32, pp. 93–95. (In Chinese)
14. Li, Zhengtao, 2020. Integration of Five Aspects of Education Promotes High-Quality Development of Basic Education. People’s Education, no. 71 (20), pp. 13–15. (In Chinese)
15. Zheng, Yue, 2022. A brief discussion on the research and practice of teaching reform of basic courses in art design and fine arts with diverse integration of online and offline methods. Proceedings of the new era higher education development forum, no. 12, pp. 350–351. (In Chinese)