UDC: 
37.0(092) Караковский В. А.
Belyaev Gennnady Yurievich
Кандидат педагогических наук, Senior Researcher, Center for Strategy and Theory of Personality Upbringing of the Federal State Budget, Scientific Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the RAO, gennady.belyaev2011@yandex.ru, Moscow

THE SOCIO-PEDAGOGIC ROLE OF THE INNOVATIVE KARAKOVSKY SCHOOL OF THOUGHT: ITS HUMANISTIC MEANINGS AND THE RUSSIAN TRADITIONS OF EDUCATION

Abstract: 
The author analyzes the leading innovative ideas of practical school of humanism introduced by the great Russian pedagogue V. A. Karakovsky. The content and meaning of innovation school of Karakovsky reviewed in the context of opposition to the two guiding philosophies and trends of the present-day world – modern humanism and postmodernism. The place of Karakovsky in the media of the Russian philosophy of education is emphasized. The value, role and place of the creative heritage of Karakovsky for the meaningful innovation updates of the leading traditions of Russian education is proved.
Keywords: 
innovation, school of practical humanism, personality, society, post-modernism, humanism, shaping personality education, traditions
Please register
References: 

1. Akhiezer, A. S., Matveeva, S. Ya., 1990. Gu-manizm kak jelement kul’tury [Humanism as an element of culture]. Obshhestvennye nauki [Social sciences], 2, pp. 143–173 (in Russ.).
2. Global’nye problemy i obshhechelovecheskie cennosti [Global issues and human values]. Мoscow: Progress Publ., 1990, 495 p. (in Russ.).
3. Grigoriev, D. V., Karakovsky, V. A., 2012. Vosxozhdenie k Shkole prakticheskogo gumaniz-ma [Ascent to the school of practical humanism]. Voprosy vospitaniya [The questions of education], 2 (11), April – June, pp. 99–116 (in Russ.).
4. Gumanizm [Humanism] [online]. Available at: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/285/ГУМАНИЗМ. (Accessed 23 December 2015) (in Russ.).
5. Deleuze, J., Gvattari F., 2010. Tysyacha pla-to. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya [A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia]. Ekaterinburg: U-Fak-toriya Publ.; Мoscow: Astrel Publ., 894 p. (in Russ.).
6. Ilyin, I. P., 1998. Postmodernizm ot istokov do konca stoletiya: e’volyuciya nauchnogo mifa [Postmodernism from the beginnings until the end of the century: the evolution of the science myth]. Мoscow: Intrada Publ., 255 p. (in Russ.).
7. Karakovsky, V. A., 2006. Klassnym ruk-ovoditelyam posvyashhaetsya [The classroom tutors is dedicated to]. Vospitatel’naya rabota v shkole [Educational work in school], 1, pp. 5–10 (in Russ.).
8. Karakovsky, V. A., 1997. Shkol’noe vospitanie kak upravlyaemaya sistema [School education as a managed system]. Mir obrazovaniya [The world of education], 1, pp. 79– 85 (in Russ.).
9. Karakovsky, V. A., 1993. Obshhechelovecheskie cennosti – osnova celostnogo uchebno-vospitatel’nogo processa [Universal values – as the basis of holistic educational process]. Vospitanie shkol’nikov [Education of schoolchildren], 3, pp. 2–8 (in Russ.).
10. Kutyrev, V. A., 2001. Kul’tura i texnologiya: bor’ba mirov [Culture and technology: the struggle of the worlds]. Мoscow: Progress-Tradition Publ., 240 p. (in Russ.).
11. Selivanova, N. L., 2013. Predposylki sozdaniya perspektivnyx modelej vospitaniya [The prerequisites for prospective models of education]. Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal [Siberian Pedagogical Journal], 3, pp. 25–29 (in Russ., abstr. in Eng.).
12. Xoruzhij, S. S., 1994. Posle pereryva. Puti russkoj filosofii [After the break. The ways of Russian philosophy]. St. Petersburg: Aletheia Publ., 445 p. (in Russ.).