UDC: 
159.922.8+316.6
Bochantceva Lyudmila Ivanovna
Кандидат психологических наук, Cand. Sci. (Psychol.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Tyumen State University, Tyumen State University, bochanceva.lyudmila@mail.ru, Tyumen

ANTISOCIAL TEENAGERS WITH IMPAIRED COMMUNICATION AS AN OBJECT OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY

Abstract: 
The article contains the description of the psychological characteristics antisocial teenagers are difficult to communicate. The author cites signs of antisocialness in the behavior of adolescents, describes the specificity of their communication. Based on the results of the pilot study provided a descriptive portrait of adolescent antisocial with difficulty in communication. This study opens the possibility of a deep analysis of the psychological regularities and mechanisms of the difficulty of communication and regulation of antisocial behavior in adolescents
Keywords: 
teenagers are difficult to communicate, difficulty in communicating personality, antisocial behavior, dissociality personality, antisocial portrait of a teenager with difficult communication
References: 

1. Bochantceva L. I., 2007. Psihologicheskie sredstva normalizacii zatrudnennogo obshhenija antisocial’noj lichnosti: na primere lic junoshesko-go vozrasta [Psychological means to normalize the difficulty of communication anti-social personality: the case of teenagers]. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). Novosi-birsk: NGPU Publ., 22 p. (in Russ.).
2. Bochantceva, L. I. 2007. Psixologicheskie sredstva normalizacii zatrudnennogo obshhenija antisocial’noj lichnosti [Psychological means to normalize the difficulty of communication anti-social personality]. Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal [Siberian Pedagogical Journal], 3, pp. 206–217 p. (in Russ., abstr. in Eng.).
3. Dmitrieva, N. V, Bochantceva, L. I., 2013. Psixologicheskie sredstva normalizacii zatrudnennogo obshheniya antisocial’noj lichnosti (na primere lic yunosheskogo vozrasta) [Psychological means to normalize the difficulty of communication anti-social personality (on the example of persons of youthful age)]. Ishim: ISPI n. a. P. P. Ershov Publ., 190 p. (in Russ.).
4. Dmitrieva, N. V, Chetverikov, D. V., 2002. Psixologiya addiktivnogo povedeniya [Psychology of addictive behavior]. Novosibirsk: NSPU Publ., 287 p. (in Russ.).
5. Korolenko, C. P., Dmitrieva, N. V., 2006. Lichnostnye i dissociativnye rasstrojstva: rasshirenie granic diagnostiki i terapii [Personality and dissociative disorders: expanding the boundaries of diagnosis and therapy]. Novosibirsk: NGPU Publ., 448 p. (in Russ.).
6. Samohvalova, A. G., 2011. Kommunikativnye trudnosti rebenka: problemy, diagnostika, korrekciya [Communication difficulties of the child: problems, diagnosis, correction]. St. Petersburg: Rech Publ., 432 p. (in Russ.).
7. Samohvalova, A. G., 2011. Psixologiya det-skogo zatrudnennogo obshheniya: ontogeneticheskij aspekt [Psychology of Child hindered communication: developmental aspect]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N. A. Nekraso-va [Vestnik of Nekrasov Kostroma State University], 17, 5-6, pp. 216–222 (in Russ.).
8. Sukhov, A. N., 1993. Kriminogennoe obsh-henie v srede osuzhdennyx [Criminal communication in the environment of convicted persons]. Ryazan: RVS the Ministry of internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Publ., 133 p. (in Russ.).
9. Shmykov, V. I., 1996. Individual’nyj stil’ kom-munikativnoj aktivnosti osuzhdennyx [Individual style of communicative activity of convicted persons]. Psixologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological journal], 17, 3, pp. 44–52 (in Russ.).
10. Coupland, N., Wiemann, J. M., Giles, H., 1992. Talk as “problem” and communication as “mis-communication”: an integrative analysis. Miscommu-nication and Problematic Talk. L., 326 p.