Frizen Marina Aleksandrovna
Кандидат психологических наук, Cand. Sci. (Psychol.), Assoc. Prof., Theoretical and Applied Psychology Department, Kamchatka State University named after Vitus Bering, frizenm@yandex.ru, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy
Yanitskiy Mikhail Sergeyevich
Доктор психологических наук, Dr. Sci. (Psychol.), Social and Psychological Institute, Kemerovo State University, direktorspi@kemsu.ru, Kemerovo
Seryy Andrey Viktorovich
Доктор психологических наук, Dr. Sci. (Psychol.), Prof.,, Kemerovo State University, avgrey@yahoo.com, Kemerovo

Personal autonomy of the heads carrying out professional activity in education

Results of a scientific psychological research of heads of educational institutions personal autonomy are presented in the article. Results of the theoretical analysis of specifics of administrative activity in education as well as the internal resources of the personality involved for its realization are also reflected. Personal autonomy is considered as a key component of personal potential of the head, the interrelations at different levels of expressiveness with parameters of self-organization of activity and the self-relation are studied within the empirical research. By results of the research the following conclusions are drawn: the heads of educational institutions with more expressed personal autonomy are more goal-oriented and responsible for various aspects of activity. Various interrelations of parameters of autonomy, self-organization of activity and the self-relation are peculiar to heads in education with the different level of personal autonomy. Results of a research can be the basis for optimization of administrative activity in education.
administrative activity in educational institution, internal resources of the head, personal autonomy, the self-relation, responsibility

1. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, K. A., 1991. Strategy of life. Moscow: Thought Publ., 299 p. (In Russ.)
2. Derkach, A. A., Zazykin, V. G., 2003. Acmeology. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 256 p. (In Russ.)
3. Zhiganov, B. A., 2007. About a role of social competence of the personality to increase the efficiency of managerial personnel in the sphere of education. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). Moscow, 208 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kaliteevskaya, E. R., Leontyev, D. A., 2006. Ways of formation of self-determination of the personality at teenage age. Psychology Questions, 3, pp. 49–55. (In Russ.)
5. Klochko, A. V., Krasnoryadtsevа, O. M., 2002. Sovereignty of the personality as basis of psychological health. Siberian psychology today. Kemerovo, pp. 4–9. (In Russ.)
6. Personal potential: Structure and diagnostics. Мoscow: Smisl, 2011, 680 p. (In Russ.)
7. Petrovsky, V. A., 2006. Personality in psychology: subjectivity paradigm. Rostov on Don, Phoenix Publ., 186 p. (In Russ.)
8. Pogorelov, A. A. 2012. Self-efficiency as predictor of effective and safe behavior of the personality. News of Southern Federal University. Technical science, 4, pp. 140–145. (In Russ.)
9. Shamova, T. I., Tretyakov, P. I., Kapustin, N. P., 2001. Management of educational systems: Study guide for higher institutions. Moscow: VLADOS Publ., 320 p. (In Russ.)
10. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., 2001. On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, pp. 141–166.