UDC: 
372.016:811.161.1+81.161.1
Mandricova Galina Mihailovna
Доктор филологических наук, Head of the Department of Philology, Novosibirsk State Technical University, mandricova@mail.ru, Novosibirsk

LINGUOMETHODIC INTERPRETATION OF ANTHROPOCENTRIC OBJECTS OF THE LANGUAGE (AT LEARNING RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AS FOREIGN)

Abstract: 
The article substantiates the necessity of including in the language material lessons in the Russian language as a foreign lexical unit having the status of anthropocentric objects. The presence of such objects in the educational material that is to be learned will allow foreign students to avoid cases of communicative failures in speech communication in Russian. Anthropocentric lexical objects include the taronims – units, which are stably mixed in the production and / or perception of speech due to their formal, semantic or thematic contiguity. Taronims are a couple in which one element is the right (correct, desired) word, and the other is its erroneous substitute (for example, a symptom-syndrome). Inclusion of the taronims in the educational process in the Russian language requires their serious methodological interpretation. The procedure of methodical interpretation of potential words-taronims suggested in the work allows to include them in the study material of the lesson for mastering the lessons in Russian as a foreign language.
Keywords: 
linguodidactics, Russian as a foreign language, anthropocentric objects, teaching vocabulary in a foreign audience.
References: 

1. Karaulov, Yu.N., 2003. Russian language and language personality. - M .: Editorial URSS- 264 p.
2. Krysin, L.P., 2001. To the typology of lexical "irregularities" // Dictionary and culture of Russian speech. - M .: Indrik, - P. 221-230.
3. Kubryakova, E. S., 1995. The evolution of linguistic ideas in the second half of the XX century (The experience of paradigm analysis) / / Language and Science of the late 20 century / ed. Yu.S. Stepanova. - M., - P. 144-238.
4. Mandrikova, G. M. , 2006. Anthropocentric linguistics: new linguistic units / Classical linguistic education in the modern multicultural space - 2: Mat. Intern. scientific-practical. сonf. (April 7-10, 2006. Pyatigorsk). Part 1. - Pyatigorsk- P.227-233.
5. Morkovkin, V.V., Mandrikova, G.M, 2010. Taronomy as an anthropocentric category // Russian language: historical destinies and the present: IV International Congress of Russian Language Researchers (Moscow, MSU, March 20-23,): Proceedings and materials. - Moscow State University. - P. 311-312.
6. Morkovkin, V. V., Mandrikova, G. M., 2010. Taronomiya: concept and typological diversity // Rus. yaz. abroad. - (a). - No. 5 (222). - P. 42-48.
7. Rogoznaya, N. N., 2001. Linguistic atlas of violations in the Russian speech of foreigners. - Irkutsk,. - 332 p.
8. Fedoseeva, A. V., 2016. Role and place of appraisal units in the process of teaching Russian as a foreign language: Author's abstract. dis. ... cand. ped. sciences. - Moscow, - 19 p.
9. Shkapenko, T., Hübner, F., 2003. Russian party like a foreigner: Textbook. - Kaliningrad: FGUIPP Amber Tale,. - 200 p.
10. Hotopf, W.H.N., 1980. „Semantic Similarity as a Factor in Whole-word Slips of the Tongue”. In Fromkin - 97-109.