LINGUOMETHODIC INTERPRETATION OF ANTHROPOCENTRIC OBJECTS OF THE LANGUAGE (AT LEARNING RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AS FOREIGN)
1. Karaulov, Yu.N., 2003. Russian language and language personality. - M .: Editorial URSS- 264 p.
2. Krysin, L.P., 2001. To the typology of lexical "irregularities" // Dictionary and culture of Russian speech. - M .: Indrik, - P. 221-230.
3. Kubryakova, E. S., 1995. The evolution of linguistic ideas in the second half of the XX century (The experience of paradigm analysis) / / Language and Science of the late 20 century / ed. Yu.S. Stepanova. - M., - P. 144-238.
4. Mandrikova, G. M. , 2006. Anthropocentric linguistics: new linguistic units / Classical linguistic education in the modern multicultural space - 2: Mat. Intern. scientific-practical. сonf. (April 7-10, 2006. Pyatigorsk). Part 1. - Pyatigorsk- P.227-233.
5. Morkovkin, V.V., Mandrikova, G.M, 2010. Taronomy as an anthropocentric category // Russian language: historical destinies and the present: IV International Congress of Russian Language Researchers (Moscow, MSU, March 20-23,): Proceedings and materials. - Moscow State University. - P. 311-312.
6. Morkovkin, V. V., Mandrikova, G. M., 2010. Taronomiya: concept and typological diversity // Rus. yaz. abroad. - (a). - No. 5 (222). - P. 42-48.
7. Rogoznaya, N. N., 2001. Linguistic atlas of violations in the Russian speech of foreigners. - Irkutsk,. - 332 p.
8. Fedoseeva, A. V., 2016. Role and place of appraisal units in the process of teaching Russian as a foreign language: Author's abstract. dis. ... cand. ped. sciences. - Moscow, - 19 p.
9. Shkapenko, T., Hübner, F., 2003. Russian party like a foreigner: Textbook. - Kaliningrad: FGUIPP Amber Tale,. - 200 p.
10. Hotopf, W.H.N., 1980. „Semantic Similarity as a Factor in Whole-word Slips of the Tongue”. In Fromkin - 97-109.