UDC: 
371+37.0
Kozelskaya Carolina Alekseevna
The post-graduate student of chair of the general and social pedagogics, Voronezh state pedagogical university, alcarol1992@mail.ru, Voronezh
Shakurova Marina Viktorovna
Доктор педагогических наук, Dr. Sci. (Pedag.), Prof., Leading Analyst, Educational Content Development and Socialization Laboratory, Center of Upbringing and Personal Development, Russian Academy of Education,Prof. of the Department of Social Pedagogy, Voronezh state pedagogical university, shakurova@mail.ru, Voronezh

Pedagogical researches creativity and creative potential: search of the methodological bases

Abstract: 
Article purpose: definition of dominating methodological approaches in researches of creativity and creative potential, a substantiation of a choice of methodological approaches for pedagogical research of children’s creative associations. As dominating the ontologic approach and the approach from activity positions are presented. The reference to modern researches of various authors allows to consider as claimed system, from positions akmeologi, social-cultural, personal-active, humanistic, anthropological, interdisciplinary approaches. Features of use of the ontologic approach in pedagogical researches of creativity are shown: in the attention center there is an idea of creative essence of the person (typical), development and realization of converting possibilities of each person (individual); possibilities of the person are in limits of the basic poles of existence, carry both creative, and destructive character (the defining the moral position acts).
Keywords: 
methodological approach, creativity, creative potential, the ontologic approach, the approach from activity positions, children’s creative association
Please register
References: 

1. Altshuller, G. S., 2004. Creativity as the exact science. Petrozavodsk: Scandinavia, 96 p. (In Russ.).
2. Batishchev, G. S., 1990. Not settled possibilities and borders of application of a category of activity // Activity: the Theory. Methodology. Problems. Мoscow: Politizdat, p. 21-34.
3. Gagarina, O. S., 2008. Creativity as the intrinsic characteristic of the person. Cand. Sci. (Philos.), 27 p. (In Russ.).
4. Glotova, G. A., 1992. Creatively presented person: Problems and research methods. - Ekaterinburg: UrGU, p. 76-78. (In Russ.).
5. Gubin, V. D., 1987. Culture and creative activity. - Мoscow: Publishing house UDN, 87 p. (In Russ.).
6. Dukа, S. I., 1993. Tvorchestvo as dialogue. Cand. Sci. (Philos.), 16 p. (In Russ.).
7. Djachkova, O. N., 2006. Kategorialnaja model of creativity // The philosophy Sum. Vol. 6. Ekaterinburg: Publishing house of the Ural university, p. 71-79. (In Russ.).
8. Konova, E. V., 2012. Development social creativity the future experts in work with youth in the educational environment of high school. Cand. Sci. (Ped.), 23 p. (In Russ.).
9. Martinovich, N. V, 2005. Development of creative potential of the person in higher education system. Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), 174 p. (In Russ.).
10. Nasakova, B. Zh., 2013. Development of creative potential of senior pupils in profile training. Cand. Sci. (Ped.), 25 p. (In Russ.).
11. Nikolko, V. N., 1990. Creativity as innovative process. Simferopol: Tavriya, 189 p. (In Russ.).
12. Nikolko, V. N., 2014. A formalizatsionnyj method of scientific knowledge // Scientific notes of Tavrian national university of V. I. Vernadsky. A series «Philosophy. Cultural science. Political science. Sociology». Volume 27 (66), № 3, p. 387-392. (In Russ.).
13. Petrov, K. V., 2008. The Akmeologichesky concept of development of creative potential of pupils. Dr. Sci. (Psychol.), 753 p. (In Russ.).
14. Ponomarev Ja. A, 1976. Psihologija of creativity. Мoscow: Publishing house "Science", 304 p. (In Russ.).
15. Rappoport S. H., 2017. From the artist to the spectator. Problems of art creativity. Мoscow: Lan. Planeta muzyki, 236 p. (In Russ.).
16. Riker P., 2002. Conflict of interpretations: Sketches about germenevtik. Мoscow: Kanon-Press-Ts. Kuchkovo pole, 372 p. (In Russ.).
17. Romanenko, J. M ., 2003. The Ontologic approach to imagination or the imagined approach to Ontologic // The Bulletin of the St.-Petersburg university. A series 6. № 4 (№ 30), p. 19-24. (In Russ.).
18. Stoletov, A. I., 2009. Ontologija of art creativity. Dr. Sci. (Philos.), 32 p. (In Russ.).
19. Strakhov I.V., 1998. Psychology of literary creativity. Мoscow: Institute of practical psychology; Voronezh: MPO «MODEK», 379 p. (In Russ.).
20. Shakurova, M. V., 2004. Development of creative potential of children theatrical art means // The Person and a society: history and the present: the interuniversity collection of proceedings. Vol. 3. Voronezh: Voronezh state pedagogical university, p. 86-100. (In Russ.).
21. Shimina, A. N., 2014. Modern life of concept general and an activity principle // The Person, history, culture: to E. V. Ilenkova's 90 anniversary: the monography. Ust Kamenogorsk: The Kazahstansko-American free university, p. 325-331. (In Russ.).
22. Shubinsky V.S., 1988. Pedagogika of creativity of pupils. Мoscow: Knowledge, 79 p. (In Russ.).
23. Shumilin, A. T., 1989. Problems of the theory of creativity. Мoscow: The Higher school, 143 p. (In Russ.).
24. Amabile T. M., 2013. Componential Theory of Creativity. Available at: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/12-096.pdf. (accessed: 26.03.2018).
25. Epstein R., 2005. Capturing creativity. Available at: http://www.creativelyspeaking.com/pdf/article_capturing_creativity.pdf. (accessed: 26.03.2018).
26. Sternberg R. J., 2006. The Nature of Creativity // Creativity Research Journal. Vol. 18. № 1, p. 87–98.