head of department, Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, ynpolyakova@yandex.ru, Moscow

Diagnostics of social and pedagogical environment collective of employees of the corrective institution

Problem and Aim. The effectiveness of the process of professional development of employees of the penitentiary system in terms of humanization of the process of execution of sentences and the increasing intensity of professional activity is largely ensured by their socio-pedagogical support. The purpose of the article is to determine the structural elements of the socio – pedagogical environment of correctional staff as a system of conditions for the organization of socio-pedagogical support of young employees. To justify the choice of diagnostic tools used to assess the socio-pedagogical environment. Methodology. Theoretical analysis of the phenomenon of “socio-pedagogical environment” allowed to determine its main elements that relate to indicators of socio-psychological climate and organizational culture of the team. As a diagnostic tool, the author used the “Test of organizational culture of institutions of the UIS” and developed a questionnaire to identify some of the characteristics of the respondents and their relationships in the team. In conclusion, it is concluded that the socio-pedagogical diagnostics allows to evaluate the resource of the collective, which should be used in the organization of the process of socio-pedagogical support of young employees of the correctional institution. The practical significance of the article lies in the fact that on the basis of diagnostics the development of programs of socio-pedagogical support of young employees is carried out, and the process of socio-pedagogical support is an important factor in their professional development.
employees of the penitentiary system, socio-pedagogical support, professional formation, entry into office, socio-pedagogical diagnostics

1. Bykova, P. R., 2018. Organizational culture and staff adaptation. Modern technologies of personnel management proceedings of the V International scientific-practical conference. Under the scientific edit. of O. S. Reznikova, pp. 209–212. (In Russ.)
2. Voronin, A. S., 2006. Dictionary of terms on general and social pedagogy. Ekaterinburg: USTU  – UPI Publ., 180 p. (In Russ.)
3. Voronkova, D. V., 2014. Emotional burnout and coping strategies of employees in various organizational cultures. Actual problems of psychological knowledge, 2 (31), pp. 74–80. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Gorbushina, A. V., 2018. The development of the system of motivation of professional activity in the context of pedagogical activity. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 5, pp. 83–94. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Ermolov, E. O., Shamshikova, O. A., Schemel, A. O., 2017. The influence of coping behavior on the socio-psychological climate in the structural divisions of the OVD. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 3, pp. 103–108. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Korytkov, V. A., Leopa, A. V., 2018. Model of adaptation of military specialists to professional activities in the process of training in military occupational specialties. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 3, pp. 77–83. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Kochemasova, L. А., 2002. Variety of “environments”: socio-pedagogical analysis. Science of the XXI century: problems and prospects: materials of the XXIV teaching and XLII student scientific and practical conference. Orenburg: Orenburg State Pedagogical University Publ., pp. 122–125. (In Russ.)
8. Nesmeyanova, R. K., 2018. Communication of social and demographic characteristics of employees with their organizational identification and attractiveness of corporate culture for them. Social Psychology and Society, Vol. 9, № 1, pp. 67–77. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Necenko, O. V., 2017. Diagnostics of the environment in pedagogical theory and modern social-pedagogical practices. Bulletin of Orthodox St. Tikhon’s Humanitarian University. Series 4: Pedagogy. Psychology, 44, pp. 57–66. (In Russ.)
10. Nurakhmetov, S. T., 2018. Pedagogical support of professional and personal development of cadets of a military university. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 1, pp. 70–77. (In Russ.)
11. Patutina, N. А., 2008. The ratio of institutional, corporate and organizational cultures and their impact on the socialization of employees. University Bulletin (State University of Management), 13, pp. 427–432. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Pestrikov, D. V., 2017. The influence of the organizational culture of institutions and bodies of the penitentiary system on the formation of an employee’s position. Applied Legal Psychology, 4, pp. 83–89. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Popova, V. I., 2003. Non-audit activity as a socio-pedagogical environment of students’ education. Bulletin of OGU, 4, pp.119–123. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Raspopin, E. V., 2014. Test of Organizational Culture of Penitentiary Institutions. Bulletin of Kuzbass Institute, 2 (19), pp. 93–100. (In Russ.)
15. Sergeeva, M. G., Pugachev, I. A., Kalinina, J. M., Sapfirov, S. L., Ippolitova, N. V., Parfenov, S. U., Paklina, A. V., 2018. Professional competence principle in context of future profession. Espacios, Vol. 39, № 38, pp. 27–35. (In Eng.)
16. Gillies, R. M., 2007. Cooperative leaning. Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications, INC Publ., 288 p. (In Eng.)