UDC: 
37.01
Maksimova Elena Aleksandrovna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Foreign languages department, assistant professor, Saratov Socio-Economic Institute of Plekhanov University of Economics, maksimolena@yandex.ru, Saratov

ANTHROPOLOGICAL COMPONENT OF THE COMPETENCE-ORIENTED PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION

Abstract: 
Problem and aim. The article shows a paradox of the modern condition of the system of professional education. It is aimed at the socially anticipated competence-coded result, while essentially it is a socio-cultural form of the individual development of a person. The purpose of the article is to provide a brief review of the theoretical research of anthropological understanding of the competence basis of modern education. Methodology. The research is carried out on the basis of the combination of the anthropological approach to the content of education and competence approach to its results. The role of the teacher on the process of the students’ becoming a professional is underlined. The essence of the anthropological approach is revealed. It is the orientation of the system of professional education on the meeting of the individual needs through discovering multifactorial sources of personal development. Anthropological understanding of project work is shown as the reveal of the resources for personal development. It is shown that hierarchy of pedagogical values is changed due to the accent on the whole educational process rather than goal achievement. Changes in the understanding of pedagogical professionalism are marked. The conclusion is drawn that it is possible to combine orientation of the professional training on the result with its orientation on the individual personal development when competence-oriented professional education is supplemented with the anthropological component.
Keywords: 
anthropological approach in the professional education, competence-oriented activity, anthropic technologies, result of the education
References: 

1. Aleksandrova, Е. А., 2016. Methodology of combining processes of individualization and socialization in the educational practice. Rehabilitation, habilitation and socialization: an interdisciplinary approach. Moscow, pp. 14–24. (In Russ)
2. Golovanova, D. A., Isaykina, M. A., Nedogreeva, N. G., 2014. The role of net interaction in providing the quality of professional education. Conference proceedings. – SRC Sociosfera, № 4 (24), pp. 27–37. (In Russ.)
3. Gorbunova, N. V., 2006. Socio-cultural regularities and tendencies in the development of human capital. Saratov, 408 p. (In Russ.)
4. Grigoreva, T. Yu., 2013. Training of modern specialists: ethics and innovation. Science and society, № 1 (10), pp. 137–140. (In Russ.)
5. Dmitriev, S. D., 2011. Anthropic higher school technologies – it is not an educated specialist, but a developing professional that counts. Physical education of students, № 3, pp. 37–41. (In Russ.)
6. Zverev, S. M., 2010. Problem field of the anthropology of education. Methodological notes. Educational psychology, № 11, pp. 4–9. (In Russ.)
7. Code of business ethics of the Public company Russian railways. [online]. Available at: http://doc.rzd.ru/doc/public/ru?id=6582&layer_id=5104&STRUCTURE_ID=704 (accessed: 01.09.2018). (In Russ.)
8. The model of the Federal state educational standard of the bachelor level. [online]. Available at: http://fgosvo.ru/fgosvo/142/141/16 (accessed: 10.09.2018). (In Russ.)
9. Maksakov, A. D., 2007. Development of the anthropological orientation of the teacher in the process of his professional training. Moscow, 129 p. (In Russ.)
10. Pazukhina, S. V., 2012. Training future teachers: an anthropological approach. Concept: scientific and methodical electronic journal, № 7 (July). [online]. Available at: http://www.covenok.ru/koncept/2012/12085.htm (accessed: 07.09.2018). (In Russ.)
11. Professional standard “Teacher of professional training, professional education and supplementary professional education”. [online]. Available at: http://fgosvo.ru/news/1/1344 (accessed: 07.09.2018). (In Russ.)
12. Romm, Т. А., 2016. The transformation of the higher education in Russia. Bulletin of pedagogical innovations, № 1 (41), pp. 11–17. (In Russ.)
13. Federal state educational standard of higher education for the training direction 38.03.01 Economics (bachelor level). [online]. Available at: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/fgosvob/380301.pdf (accessed: 01.09.2018). (In Russ.)
14. Sleurs, W., 2008, ed. Competencies for ESD (Education for Sustainable Development) teachers. A framework to integrate ESD in the curriculum of teacher training institutes. Brussels, 320 p. (In Eng.)
15. Manning, K., 2000. Ceremonies and Cultural Meaning in Higher Education. Westport, CT.: Bergin & Garvey Publ., 186 p. (In Eng.)
16. Rauch, F., 2004. Education for Sustainability: a Regulative Idea and Trigger for Innovation. Scott. W. & Gough. S. Key Issues in Sustainable Development and Learning: A Critical Review. London: Routledge Falmer Publ., pp. 149–151. (In Eng.)