DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.1903.01
UDC: 
37.01
Mudrik Anatoly Viktorovich
Доктор педагогических наук, Professor of the Department of social pedagogy and psychology, Moscow state pedagogical University, amudrik@yandex.ru, Moscow
Patutina Natalia Anatol’evna
Доктор педагогических наук, Assoc. Prof. of the Department of State and Municipal Administration and Law, Moscow City Pedagogical University, patutinaw@yandex.ru, Moscow

DETERMINANTS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE POTENCIES OF THE COMPONENTS OF THE SOCIALIZATION PROCESS

Abstract: 
The purpose of the article is to identify, general systematization and a brief description of the determinants of positive and negative potential of spontaneous, relatively directed and relatively socially controlled socialization. Analysis of the theoretical elaboration of the problem showed that monodisciplinary and interdisciplinary research provides a multilateral characteristic of socialization, but do not consider its components as independent subjects of study. Including, therefore, the determinants of positive and negative potential of spontaneous, relatively guided and relatively socially controlled socialization have not been studied. The study identified and systematized the determinants of positive and negative potentials of the components of the socialization process. With regard to spontaneous socialization: the sociocultural state of the society, the mentality of the ethnos, the trend of state policy in the sociocultural sphere, which influence the character of the potencies through the traditional, stylized and cybersocialization mechanisms. In relation to the direction of socialization: the development of public policy in the social sphere and the effectiveness of its implementation, technological development and interpretation, development and content of electronic media that affect the nature of potential through an institutional mechanism. In relation to socially controlled socialization (upbringing): characteristics of personal resources of educators and educators, implicit “theories” of personality and upbringing, historical traditions and socio-psychological climate of settlements, state policy in the field of education and the effectiveness of its implementation. These determinants influence the character of the potencies through specific mechanisms in social and remedial education through institutional, in family education through traditional and interpersonal, in religious – through traditionally institutional and stylized-interpersonal, in dissocial – also stylized and interpersonal mechanisms. The influence of all socialization mechanisms is ambivalent, i.e. in one way or another, they determine the positivity and negativity of influence on the components of the socialization process of one or another determinant. The actualization of the positive and negative potentialities of the components of the socialization process to a greater or lesser extent determines their character, meaningful content and forms of manifestation.
Keywords: 
socialization, spontaneous socialization, relatively socially controlled socialization, potency, determinants, socialization mechanisms
References: 

1. Belinskaya, E. P., Tikhomandritskaya, O. A., 2013. Problems of socialization: history and modernity. Moscow; Voronezh: Moscow Psychological and Social University Publ.: MODEK Publ., 208 p. (In Russ.)
2. Belinskaya, E. P., Stefanenko, T. G., 2013. Ethnic socialization of adolescents. Moscow; Voronezh: Moscow Psychological and Social University Publ.: MODEK Publ., 208 p. (In Russ.)
3. Buchkova, A. I., 2013. The essence and features of political socialization in modern Russia. Moscow, 27 p. (In Russ.)
4. Veselova, V. V., 2016. Information and communication technologies as a subject of the process of socialization. Social pedagogy in modern social practices. A collection of scientific articles of the VI International Symposium. June 2–5. Arzamas: Arzamas branch of UNN Publ., pp. 71–79. (In Russ.)
5. Golovina, N. F., 2004. Socialization and education of the child. St. Petersburg: Speech Publ., 272 p. (In Russ.)
6. Danilov, A. N., 2017. Undigested lessons of history. Bulletin of RUDN. Series: Sociology, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 460–467. (In Russ.)
7. Dementieva, I. F., 2006. Socialization of children in the family in the conditions of transformation: trends, factors, determinants. Moscow, 47 p. (In Russ.)
8. Dubovskaya, E. M., 2002. Socialization in a changing world. Social psychology in the modern world. Moscow: Aspect Press Publ., pp. 148–162. (In Russ.)
9. Dubovskaya, E. M., Korablinov, R. A., 2013. Economic socialization in a transitive society. Social Psychology and Society, No. 4, pp. 5–18. (In Russ.)
10. Durkheim, E., 1995. Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose. Moscow: Canon Publ., 349 p. (In Russ.)
11. Ignatova, L. Yu., Semicheva, M. V., 2017. Socialization of the individual as a problem of research of domestic and foreign scientists. Education and Upbringing, No. 1, pp. 13–15. (In Russ.)
12. Ilyin, S. E., 2017. Attributes of theoretical images of socialization: to reflection on the socio-cultural side of knowledge. Ideas and Ideals, No. 2 (32), Vol. 2, pp. 60–68. (In Russ.)
13. Kovaleva, A. I., 1996. Socialization of the individual: the norm and deviation. Moscow: Institute of Youth Publ., 222 p. (In Russ.)
14. Kon, I. S., 1989. Psychology of early adolescence. Moscow: Enlightenment Publ., 256 p. (In Russ.)
15. Kon, I. S., 2003. Child and society. Moscow: Academy Publ., 336 p. (In Russ.)
16. Kon, I. S., 2010. The boy is the father of a man. Moscow: Time Publ., 704 p. (In Russ.)
17. Kletsina, I. S., 1998. Gender socialization. St. Petersburg: RGPU them A. I. Herzen Publ., 92 p. (In Russ.)
18. Krasnaya, M. A., 2015. Features of civil socialization of youth in modern society. Moscow, 38 p. (In Russ.)
19. Coleman, J., 2001. Capital social and human. Social sciences and modernity, No. 3, pp. 121–139. (In Russ.)
20. Mudrik, A. V., 1983. Personality and its education in the team. Moscow: Knowledge Publ., 96 p. (In Russ.)
21. Mudrik, A. V., 1991. Socialization and troubled times. Moscow: Knowledge Publ., 79 p. (In Russ.)
22. Mudrik, A. V., 2010. Socialization of man. Moscow; Voronezh: MPSI Publ.: MODEK Publ., 624 p. (In Russ.)
23. Mudrik, A. V., 2014. Study of the transformation of socialization mechanisms. Bulletin of PSTGU. Series: Pedagogy Psychology, No. 4, pp. 44–51. (In Russ.)
24. Pleshakov, V. A., 2011. The theory of human cyber socialization. Moscow: MPGU Publ.: Homo Cyberus Publ., 400 p. (In Russ.)
25. Rosum, S. I., 2006. Psychology of socialization and social adaptation of man. St. Petersburg: Speech Publ., 365 p. (In Russ.)
26. Smelser, N., 1998. Sociology. Moscow: Phoenix Publ., 688 p. (In Russ.)
27. Yadova, V. A., 2005, ed. Social Transformation in Russia: Theories, Practices, Comparative Analysis. Moscow: MPSI Publ., 584 p. (In Russ.)
28. Chuprov, V. I., Zubok, Yu. A., Williams, K., 2003. Young People in a Risk Society. Moscow: Science Publ., 231 p. (In Russ.)
29. Schumpeter, J., 2007. Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, socialism, democracy. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 864 p. (In Russ.)
30. Giddings, F. P., 1897. The Theory of socialization. New York. (In Eng.)
31. Gollin, D. A., 1969, ed. Handbook of Socialization theory and research. Chi. (In Eng.)
32. Hurrelmann, K., 2009. Social structure and personality development. Cambr. (In Eng.)
33. Parsons, T., Bales, R., 1998. Family Socialization and interaction process. L. (In Eng.)