## Development and Evaluation of Logical Universal Educational Actions

1. Asmolov, A. G., Burmenskaya, G. V., Volodarskaya, I. A., 2008. How to design a universal learning activities in elementary school, from action to thought. Teacher’s Guide. Moscow: Prosveschenie Publ., 151 p. (In Russ.)

2. Bozhenkova, L. I., 2013. Methodology for the formation of universal educational actions in teaching geometry. Moscow: BINOM. Lab Knowledge Publ., 205 p. (In Russ.)

3. Bozhenkova, L. I., Sokolova, E. V., 2017. About assessment activities in learning of mathematics. Mathematics and mathematical education. VIII International scientific conf. «Mathematics. Education. Culture». Togliatti, pp. 38–44. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Glazkov, Y. A., Egupova, M. V., 2016. Developing multipurpose educational activity while teaching mathematics in primary school: tasks, methodological approaches [online]. Bulletin of the Orenburg State Pedagogical University, No 3., pp. 168–174. Available at: http://www.vestospu.ru/archive/2016/articles/Glazkov_Egupova4-20.html (accessed: 02.09.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Dulatova, Z. A., Kovyrshina, A. I., Lapshina, E. S., Shtykov, N. N., 2017. Formation, development and evaluation of logical universal learning activities. Part 1. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, No. 3, pp. 24–33. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Zhuravlev, I. A., 2014. Diagnosis of the level of formation of universal learning activities of students at mathematics classes. Modern problems of science and education, No. 1, pp. 101–109. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. Kerroll, L., 2017. Symbolic logic or flawless nonsense. Moscow: Lexter Publ., 252 p. (In Russ.)

8. Mordkovich, A. G., 2009. Algebra and beginning of mathematical analysis. Grade 10. Part 2. Moscow: Mnemosyne Publ., 343 p. (In Russ.)

9. Shkerina, L. V., Cave, M. A., Zhuravleva, N. A., Berseneva, O. V., 2017. The methods to diagnose universal learning actions of students when teaching mathematics. Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafiev, No. 3(41), pp. 17–29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

10. Miyazaki, M., 2000. Levels of Proof in Lower Secondary School Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 41(1), pp. 47–68. (In Eng.)

11. Thompson, D. R., 1996. Learning and teaching indirect proof. The Mathematics Teacher, Vol. 89(6), pp. 474–482. (In Eng.)

12. Zazkis, R., Chernoff, E., 2008. What makes a counterexample exemplary?. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 68(3), pp. 195–208. (In Eng.)