DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2001.04
UDC: 
372.881.161.1
Kulakova Natalya Vasilyevna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedagogic.), Assoc.Prof. of the Department of Russian Language and Methods of its Teaching, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafiev, kulakova-nv@yandex.com, Krasnoyarsk
Vekkesser Maria Viktorovna
Кандидат филологических наук, Cand. Sci. (Philologic.), Chair of the Department of Philology and Language Communication, Lesosibirsk Pedagogical Institute – branch of Siberian Federal University, vekkesser2012@yandex.ru, Lesosibirsk
Rostova Marina Leonidovna
Senior Lecturer, Department of Philology and Language Communication, Lesosibirsk Pedagogical Institute – branch of Siberian Federal University, rostovaml@rambler.ru, Lesosibirsk

Techique Using of “Voicing Cartoons / Videos” in the Process of Linguistic Abilities Development of Primary School Students

Abstract: 
Introduction. In this paper, we will consider the possibilities of using the technique of “scoring of cartoon”, aimed at improving the linguistic abilities of younger students. The choice of the research topic is due to the fact that linguistic abilities are one of the key components of successful language education and instruction in general. The purpose of the paper is to reflect the level of development of linguistic abilities of primary school children and to present the method of using the technique “scoring of cartoons”, contributing to the development of these abilities. Methodology and methods of research. To solve this problem, the following methods were used: an analysis of pedagogical and linguistic-methodical sources, a comparative analysis, generalization of pedagogical and linguistic-methodical data obtained in the study of primary sources. The source base of the study is represented by scientific and methodological literature, pedagogical and linguistic methodological periodicals, and modern dissertation research on the problem under study. The methodological basis of the research is the methodology of the linguodidactic approach, the conceptual statements of the theory of linguistic personality, the methodology of pedagogical science. In the framework of the study the concept of the development of universal educational activities; the concept of problem-based learning; the principles of modern linguistics are of particular importance. Results. From the outcome of our investigation it is possible to conclude that using of scoring of cartoon will contribute to more effective development of linguistic abilities of younger students. Conclusion. In this paper, the authors consider the methods of using of the technique of “scoring of cartoon” contributing to the development of linguistic abilities of pupils in a modern organized pedagogical process in the unity of educational and extracurricular activities.
Keywords: 
linguistic abilities, primary schoolchildren, scoring of cartoons, speech development, grammatical competence, sociolinguistic competence, discursive competence, sociocultural competence
Please register
References: 

1. Alibina, A., 1977. Features of mnemonic activity and learning a foreign language. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Psychological). Moscow, 16 p. ( In Russ.).
2. Andrievskaya, V.V., 1967. Psychological features of the formation of grammatical generalizations at the initial stage of teaching a foreign language. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Psychological). Moscow, 20 p. ( In Russ.).
3. Bogojavlenskaja, D.B. 1971. Metod issledovanija urovnej intellektual'noj aktivnosti. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Psychological). Moscow. 17 p. Access mode: http://irbis.gnpbu.ru/Aref_1971/Bogoyavlenskaya_D_B (accessed March 12, 2019) (In Russ.).
4. Halperin, P.Ya. 1967. To the psychology of learning a foreign language // Scientific-methodical conference on the teaching of foreign languages at school. Moscow, pp. 60-63. (In Russ.).
5. Gurevich, K.M., Borisova E.M. 2007. Psychological diagnostics: textbook. St. Petersburg: Publishing house “Peter”, 123 p. (In Russ.).
6. Druzhinin, V. N. 1996. Psychodiagnosis of general abilities. Moscow: Nauka, 178 p. (In Russ.).
7. Dudetsky, A.Ya. 1974. Theoretical questions of imagination and creativity. Smolensk, 78 p. (In Russ.).
8. Dyachenko, O.M. 1996. The development of the imagination of preschool child. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye, 121 p. (In Russ.).
9. Igna, O.N. 2013. Approaches to the identification of linguistic giftedness and ability to foreign languages. Actual problems of linguodidactics. Bulletin of TSPU (TSPU Bulletin). No. 3 (131). Pp. 115-119. (In Russ, abstract in Eng.).
10. Zimnaya, I.A. 1997. Pedagogical psychology. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix, 480 p. (In Russ.).
11. Koreshkova, T.V. 2006. Preparing a future teacher: how to teach younger students to create statements // Primary School. No. 3. Pp. 82-85. (In Russ.).
12. Kulakova, N.V. 2014. The development of coherent oral speech of younger schoolchildren through the scoring of video films // Theory and practice of pedagogical science in the modern world: traditions, problems, innovations. Materials of the international scientific-practical conference. In 2 vols., part 1. Novokuznetsk: Publishing house of KuzSPA, pp. 297-299. (In Russ.).
13. Kulakova, N.V., Averina, I.A. 2015. Scoring of cartoons as a means of developing communicative competence of primary school children // Communicative processes in the educational space: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Krasnoyarsk, November 13-14, 2015 [Electronic resource] executive editorEd.L.G.Samotik. The electron. Data. Krasnoyarsk State Ped.University named after V.P. Astafyev. Krasnoyarsk, pp. 214-217. (In Russ.).
14. Magin, N.S. 1962. About some types of abilities to master a foreign language // Problems of abilities. Moscow: APS of the RSFSR, pp. 276-288. (In Russ.).
15. Mazurik, T.N. 1984. The influence of the individual psychological qualities of students on the successful mastering of a foreign language. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Psychological). Moscow, 24 p. (In Russ.).
16. Ponomarev, Ya.A. 1967. Knowledge, thinking and mental development. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye, 201 p. (In Russ.).
17. Prosetskiy, P.A., Semichenko, V.A. 1989. Psychology of creativity: a training manual. Moscow, Prometheus, 82 p. (In Russ.).
18. Rean, A. A., Bordovskaya, N. V., Rozum, S. I. 2002. Psychology and pedagogy. St. Petersburg: Peter, 324 p. (In Russ.).
19. Rubinstein, S.L. 2008. Fundamentals of General Psychology. St. Petersburg, Publishing house “Peter”, 20 p. (In Russ.).
20. Smirnov, A.A. 1987. Selected psychological works. In 2 vols. Moscow, Pedagogy, 108 p. (In Russ.).
21. Federal State Educational Standard of primary general education. Access mode: https://kpfu.ru/docs/F2009061155/FGOS (accessed date: 02/14/2019) (In Russ.).
22. Sholpo, I.L. 1999. How to teach a preschooler to speak English: A manual on the methodology of teaching English for pedagogical universities, colleges and schools majoring in “Teacher of a foreign language in kindergarten”. St. Petersburg: Special literature, 89 p. (In Russ.).
23. Elkonin, D.B. 1960. Child psychology. Moscow, Pedagogy, 384 p. (In Russ.).
24. Akhmanova, O., 1971. Concerning Linguistic Competence // Modern Language Journal. Vol.55. № 7. Pp. 454-455. (In Eng.).
25. Beretta, A. 1992. Evaluation of language education : an overview // Evaluating second language education. Cambridge : C.U.P., pp. 5-24. (In Eng.).
26. Biedron, A., Szczepaniak, A. 2009. The cognitive profile of a talented foreign language learner. A casestudy. Psychology of Language and Communication, 13(1). (In Eng.).
27. Canale, M., Swain, M. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches of second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics. № 1. Pp. 1-47. (In Eng.).
28. Carroll, J. B. 1981. Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. Diller K. C. Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 83-118. (In Eng.).
29. Wen, Z., Biedron, A., Skehan, P. 2017. Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 50(1), pp. 1-31. (In Eng.).