DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2002.08
UDC: 
378
Shkerina Lyudmila Vasilyevna
Доктор педагогических наук, Dr. Sci. (Pedag.), Prof. of the Department of mathematics and methods of teaching mathematics, Astafiev V. P. Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, shkerina@mail.ru, Krasnoyarsk
Keiv Maria Anatolievna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of mathematics and methods of teaching mathematics, Astafiev V. P. Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, mkejv@yandex.ru, Krasnoyarsk

Design of Master’s Programs in the Fields of Training 44.04.01 – Pedagogical Education in Transition to the Fses Hi 3++

Abstract: 
Educational practice as a component of master’s programs in the field of training 44.04.01 – Pedagogical education has not been studied enough, although it has a great potential for the building of students ‘ competencies in the process of theoretical training. It is allowed to state a research problem. This problem consists in determination of didactic potential of the training practice and the modalities for its implementation to improve the impact of competency building of future Masters’ in the process of theoretical study due to realization FSES HI 3++. The aim of the article is to define design principles and to develop a model of the Master’s program for training teachers, through the integration of theoretical learning and learning practice. Methodology. The methodological basis of the study is based on dual, competence-based and contextual approaches to learning. The study uses methods of analysis of special literature and regulatory documents, pedagogical modeling and designing. Main results. The main principles of designing educational Master’s programs in the fields of training «Pedagogical education» are formulated and justified: modularity, duality, disciplinary and practical integration, variability, and context. Based on these principles, the authors created an Exemplary Main Education Program, which is presented in the Register of Exemplary Basic Educational Programs of Higher Education (draft programs).
Keywords: 
dual approach, integration, educational modules, theoretical training, educational practice
Please register
References: 

1. Abishev, A. A., Vorobyov, A. E., Murzaeva, A. K., 2017. Dual technology of teaching students in the higher education system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The journal “Human. Society. Inclusion”, no. 4 (32), pp. 92–102. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Bulakh, K. V., Zhukova, N. N., 2017. History of development of the dual system of professional education in the European Union countries. Bulletin of the Adygeya State University. Series “Pedagogy and psychology”, no. 4 (208), pp. 57–64. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Gaffarov, F. H., Hikmatullah, D. A., 2019. Advantages of the dual training system for production and in educational institutions. The journal of science, vol. 3, no. 11 (20), pp. 37–41. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Grigorieva, N. V., Shvets, N. A., 2016. Model of training specialists in the conditions of dual training. Modern problems of science and education, no. 6, pp. 395–302. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
5. Esenina, E. Yu., 2014. Features of the dual system of education in Germany. Modern problems of science and education, no. 6, pp. 841–848. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Zhukova, N. N., 2019. Cooperation of the European Union countries in the development of the dual system of professional education and training. Modern problems of science and education, no. 3–4 (47), pp. 60–63. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Klevetova, T. V., Smykovskaya, T. K., 2018. Questions of designing the main educational program of the master’s degree in the direction of “Pedagogical education” in the conditions of transition to the FSES HI 3++ (on the example of the master’s program “Physical education”). Facets of knowledge, no. 3 (56), pp. 31–37. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Kosarev, N. F., Rakhimova, L. R., 2018. Model of specialist training based on the principles of dual training. Business. Education. Right, no. 4 (45), pp. 418–422. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Listvin, A. A., 2015. Dual system of professional training: application conditions in Russia. Bulletin of Cherepovets State University, no. 3 (64), pp. 118–122. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Mutieva, T. A., 2015. Dual system of professional training: the experience of Germany and the implementation of Russia. Science Time, no. 12 (24), pp. 560–564. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Pevsner, M. N., Sherayzina, R. M., Petryakov, P. A., 2013. Search for innovative strategies for designing interdisciplinary master’s programs. Man and education, no. 4 (37), pp. 16–22. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Approximate basic educational program in the direction of training 44.04.01 Pedagogical education. Available at: http://пооп.рф/poop/16da1e86ec264e039274396b5f501ed9 (accessed: 07.02.2020). (In Russ.)
13. Professional standard “Teacher (pedagogical activity in the field of preschool, primary General, basic General, secondary General education) (educator, teacher)”. Available at: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/profstandart/01.001.pdf (accessed: 27.01.2020). (In Russ.)
14. Ryabukhin, P. B. Url-step forward in training qualified personnel [online]. Available at: http://rectors.altstu.ru/ru/periodical/archiv/2019/1/articles/2_6.pdf (аccessed: 27.01.2020). (In Russ.)
15. Starostina, S. E., Tokareva, Yu. S., 2017. Approaches to designing the master’s program “Physical and mathematical education”. Higher education in Russia, no. 11 (217), pp. 98–108. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. Federal state educational standard of higher education – 44.04.01 Pedagogical education [online]. Available at: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/FGOS%20VO%203++/Mag/440401_M_3_16032018.pdf (accessed: 27.01.2020). (In Russ.)
17. Shkerina, L. V., Shkerina, T. A., 2019. Didactic potential of interdisciplinary training modules in the formation of professional competencies of future master teachers. Bulletin of the Astafiev V. P. Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, no. 1 (47), pp. 72–79. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
18. Shkerina, L. V., Bocharova, Y. Y., Bagachuk, A. V., 2019. Basic approaches and principles of designing master`s educational programs for training teachers in additional engineering education. Bulletin of the Astafiev V. P. Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, no. 4 (50), pp. 97–106. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
19. Schelten, A., 1991. An introduction to the profession. Stuttgart. (In Germ.)
20. Support Mechanisms for Evidence-based Policy-Making in Education. Eurydice Report. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. (In Eng.)
21. Zach, R., 2007. Personality-oriented certification of the quality of additional education of organizations. Manuals, Version 3. Hanover, 77 p. (In Eng.)
22. Zholdasbekova, S., Nurzhanbayeva, Z., Smatullayevna, L., 2016. Conceptual model of training future teachers for dual education in VET (professional education and training). International journal of environmental and scientific education, no. 11 (7), pp. 1527–1538. (In Eng.)