DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2003.06
UDC: 
374+372.016:62
Shabalin Kirill Vladimirovich
Postgraduate Student of Chair, Department of Methodology and Theory of Social and Pedagogical Research, Tyumen State University, Institute of Psychology and Pedagogy, iagami35@mail.ru, Tyumen

Methods for the Formation of Creative Abilities of Students in the Classroom Robotics in the Context of Further Education

Abstract: 
Formulation of the problem: how to improve the effectiveness of the formation of creative abilities of students in robotics classes in the conditions of additional education. The purpose of this study is to find the best ways to develop creative abilities in students. Abilities are implemented in robotics classes using the Arduino platform. Methodology. The research methods include the theory of creative abilities of J. Gilford, K. Taylor, G. Gruber and Ya. a. Ponomarev, methods of analysis, synthesis, abstraction and generalization, pedagogical observation, and analysis of products of activity. The main results of the study show the productivity of the activity. Methods use of advanced robotic sets for the formation of creative abilities of the students. In addition, they include justification of the importance of the case method, reference schemes based on a given structure, and test cards in shaping the creative abilities of students in robotics classes when performing technical research projects based on the Arduino platform. The scientific novelty of the research results consists in the fact that for the first time the existing pedagogical experience and promising opportunities for the formation of creative abilities of students in robotics classes when performing technical research projects based on the Arduino platform are considered and justified. Theoretical and practical significance of the results. The theoretical significance consists in supplementing pedagogical knowledge with ideas about modern methods and techniques for creating creativity in schoolchildren-cases, test cards, and reference schemes based on a given structure. The practical significance of the study is that a method has been developed that can be useful in the formation of creative abilities in the conditions of additional education. In conclusion, Meaningful conclusions of the study: creative abilities are considered and their essence is revealed, the pedagogical potential of the Arduino platform is described in the formation of students ‘ creative abilities, on the one hand, and on the other hand, in the possibilities of working on technically and commercially significant projects.
Keywords: 
educational robotics, creative abilities, additional education, project activities, cases, mechatronics, robotics training
Please register
References: 

1. Babushkina, N. N., 2016. The development of students’ creative abilities in technology lessons. Problems of Pedagogy, no. 2, pp. 42–45. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Belyakova, E. G., 2011. Designing a meaning-oriented lesson. Experiment and innovation in school, no 3, pp. 56–58. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Gazizullin, R. R., 2018. etc. Learning to solve robotic problems in the environment LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3. NOVAUM.RU, no. 13, pp. 265–267. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Legacheva, N. M., Shvecova, L. V., Mardasova, E. V., Kozyreva, Yu. V., 2018. Implementation of a new model of continuing education in the Altai Territory (on the example of the regional technology park «Quantorium. 22») Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, no. 4, pp. 52–64. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Nevskaya, T. A., Bolotova, S. V., 2012. The development of students’ creative abilities [online]. Technology. Everything for the teacher! – Pilot release. Available at: http://www.e-osnova.ru/PDF/osnova_20_0_2585.pdf (accessed: 1.11.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Parfent’ev, E. A., 2015. The development of students’ creative abilities in technology and extracurricular activities. Young scientist, no. 24.2,
pp. 31–38. [online]. Available at: https://moluch.ru/archive/104/24694/ (accessed: 1.11.2019) (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Tuzikova, I. V., 2013. Studying robotics – the way to engineering specialties. School and production, no. 5, p. 45–47. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ, On Education in the Russian Federation [online]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/ (accessed: 1.11.2019). (In Russ.)
9. Yuldashev, Z. Yu., Bobohuzhaev, Sh. I., 2006. Innovative teaching methods. Features of the case study of the training method and ways of its practical use. Tashkent: IQTISOD-MOLIYA Publ., 2006. (In Russ.)
10. Yu, Xiaoxiang & Assaf, Dorit & Wang, Liyu & Iida, Fumiya. Robotics education: A case study in soft-bodied locomotion. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts [online]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261312531_Robotics_education_A_... (accessed: 1.11.2019)