UDC: 
378
Shkerina Lyudmila Vasilyevna
Доктор педагогических наук, Dr. Sci. (Pedag.), Prof. of the Department of mathematics and methods of teaching mathematics, Astafiev V. P. Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, shkerina@mail.ru, Krasnoyarsk
Zhuravleva Natalia Alexandrovna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Assoc. Prof. of the Department of mathematics and methods of teaching mathematics, Krasnoyarsk state pedagogical university named after V.P. Astafiev, zhuravlevanataly@mail.ru, Krasnoyarsk
Keiv Maria Anatolievna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Assoc. Prof. of the Department of mathematics and methods of teaching mathematics, Krasnoyarsk state pedagogical university named after V.P. Astafiev, mkejv@yandex.ru, Krasnoyarsk

Methodology for Identifying Subject Professional Deficits of Mathematics Teachers

Abstract: 
Modern challenges of the system of mathematical training of schoolchildren lead to an increase in subject professional deficits of a mathematics teacher. Monitoring the teacher’s professional deficits allows them to be leveled in a timely manner, thereby improving the quality of the educational process. However, the theory and method of identifying them has not been studied much. This makes it possible to state the problem of research, which consists in determining the conceptual basis of the methodology for identifying subject professional deficits of a mathematics teacher. The purpose of the article is to develop a methodology for identifying subject professional deficits of a mathematics teacher. Methodology. The methodological basis of the study was a competent approach as the basis for structuring the professional competencies of a mathematics teacher; a systematic approach as the basis for diagnosing professional deficits of a mathematics teacher; federal state educational standard for higher education in the field of training “Pedagogical education”; professional standard “Teacher (pedagogical activity in the field of preschool, primary general, basic general, secondary general education. Module “Subject training. Mathematics”, the requirements of the federal state educational standard for the mathematical training of students in a general education school). The study used methods of analyzing special literature and normative documents, pedagogical modeling and design, mathematical processing of information. Results of the study. The basic principles of the methodology for identifying subject professional deficits are formulated and substantiated: expediency, diagnosticity, systemicity and advance. Based on these principles, the authors developed a methodology for identifying subject professional deficits of a mathematics teacher. The example shows the main stages and results of diagnosing subject deficits of a mathematics teacher in the field of combinatorics and probability theory.
Keywords: 
system approach, competency approach, diagnostics, expediency, systemicity, advance, subject competencies, method of detection.
References: 

1. Altynikova, N. V., Muzaev, A. A., 2019. Subject and methodological competencies in teachers: testing the unified federal evaluation tools. Psychological Science and Education, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 31–41. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
2. Borodina, E. P., Borodin, A. L., 2018. From professional deficits in the activities of a teacher to modern educational technologies and results. Konferentsium ASOU: collection of scientific works and materials of scientific and practical conferences, 2, pp. 387–392 [online]. Available at: https://asou-mo.ru/media/download/260 (accessed 24.06.2021) (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
3. Vinogradova, A. P., 2015. Research of professional difficulties of teachers in creation of the educational process at the comprehencive school. Modern problems of science and education, 4 [online]. Available at: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=20976 (accessed 01.07.2021) (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
4. Zhuravleva, O. N., Andreevskaya, T. P., Aleksandrova, S. V., 2019. Input diagnostics of professional deficits in the system of additional professional education of teachers (based on evaluation of information and analytical competence level of the history teacher). Scientific support of a system of advanced training, 1 (38), pp. 97–106. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
5. Kamenev, R. V., 2020. Professional deficiencies of teachers of technology, analysis of subject and methodical competences. Modern problems of science and education, 3, pp. 54–62 [online]. Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=29854 (accessed 01.07.2021) (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
6. Kurdyman, N. V., 2021. Preventing professional shortfall of general education organizations teachers in the context of the Inter-municipal Resource Center activity. Bulletin of the Belgorod Institute of Education Development, vol. 8, no. 1 (19), pp. 142–154. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
7. Latsko, N. A., Avdeeva, E. N., Pikhota, O. V., 2020. Results of diagnosis of professional deficits of teachers of Sakhalin region. Sakhalin education XXI century, 1, pp. 18–26. (In Russ.)
8. Lyashevskaya, N. V., Mavrina, I. A., 2020. Criteria-level assessment of the readiness of young teachers for professional activities. Scientific support of a system of advanced training, 2 (43), pp. 64–71. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
9. Malova, I. E., Matushkina, Z. P., Penskaya, Yu. K., 2017. Designing diagnostic materials that serve for identification of readiness of future mathematics teachers for professional activity. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 12 (189), pp. 109–117. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
10. Malysheva, A. V., Kozhakina, S. O., Shramkova, O. V., 2019. Diagnostics of professional competence of deficiencies as the main factor of optimization of additional professional education of teachers. Bulletin of the Saratov Regional Institute of Education Development, 3 (19), pp. 112–117. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
11. Novopashina, L. A., Grigorieva, E. G., Kuzina, D. V., Cherkasova, Ju. A., 2020. The capabilities of mathematical modeling tools for the system of assessing teacher shortages. Science for Education Today, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 220–236. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
12. Pudenko, T. I., 2019. Conceptual foundations of the professional growth model teachers taking into account the possession of professional competencies. Education Management Review, 4 (36), pp. 4–13. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
13. Slinkin, S. V., Sadykova, E. F., Klusova, V. V., 2019. On diagnostics results of subject and methodological competences for chemistry teachers. History and Pedagogy of Natural Science, 2, pp. 18–21. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
14. Tumasheva, O. V., Shashkina, M. B., Aeshina, E. A., 2021. Professional deficiencies in mathematics teachers: an analysis of regional research results. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, vol. 10, no. 1 (34), pp. 264–268. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
15. Shaidenko, N. A., 2019. Approaches to the evaluation of deficiencies of young teachers’ professional competencies. Personal education, 3-4, pp. 12–18. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
16. Shkerina, L. V., 2021. Professional deficits of math teachers and their causes. Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafiev, 2 (56), pp. 82–92. (In Russ., abstr. in Eng.)
17. Cravens, X., Wang, J., 2017. Learning from the masters: Shanghai’s teacher-expertise infusion system. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, vol. 6 (4), pp. 306–320. DOI: 10.1108/IJLLS-12-2016-0061. (In Eng.)
18. Grau, V., Calcagni, E., Preiss, D. D., Ortiz, D., 2017. Teachers’ professional development through univer-sity-school partnerships: Theoretical standpoints and evidence from two pilot studies in Chile. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47 (1), pp. 19–36. DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2015.1102867. (In Eng.)
19. Griffin, P., Murray, L., Care, E., Thomas, A., Perri, P., 2010. Developmental assessment: Lifting literacy through professional learning teams. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17 (4), pp. 383–397. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.516628 (In Eng.)
20. Scheer, E. A., Bijlsma, H. J. E., Glas, C. A. W., 2019. Validity and reliability of student perceptions of teaching quality in primary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30 (1), pp. 30–50. DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2018.1539015 (In Eng.)