Shisharina Natalia Victorovna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof. of pedagogy, Irkutsk State University, nshisharina@yandex.ru, Irkutsk (Russia)
Romm Tatyana Alexandrovna
Доктор педагогических наук, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Pedagogics and Psychology Institute of History, Humanitarian and Social Education, Novosibirsk state pedagogical university, tromm@mail.ru, Novosibirsk
Inozemcev Pavel Olegovich
Кандидат фармацевтических наук, Senior Researcher, Department of Biomedical Research and Technology, Irkutsk Scientific Center Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, p.inozemcev@rambler.ru, Irkutsk

Hygienic Assessment of Educational Programs During the Pandemic

In 2020, the World Health Organization announced the beginning of a pandemic of the new coronavirus infection COVID-19. To prevent the spread of viral infection in all regions of the Russian Federation, a self-isolation regime was announced. In this connection, on March 15, 2020, the Ministry of Education recommended that all higher educational institutions carry out educational activities using modern information and telecommunication technologies that allow learning at a distance without direct contact between the teacher and the student - distance learning. The introduction of self-isolation and the transition to distance education led to the need to change the usual way of life, and adapt to the prevailing conditions of educational activity. The aim of this work is to analyze data on the impact of distance learning on the quality of students’ health. Methodology and research methods. The work was performed using a descriptive method by collecting, summarizing and analyzing literature data regarding the problem being studied. Results. The authors have highlighted the main characteristics of distance education. An analysis of modern sources has shown that, given the modern achievements in the field of telecommunication technologies, distance education is not fully capable of replacing the classical one; there are negative aspects both in the quality of training of students and in relation to the health of all participants in the educational process. Conclusion. With the continuation of teaching using modern information and telecommunication technologies, it is necessary to develop and implement programs aimed at preserving health and adapting to the conditions of distance education.
pandemic, distance education, students, health, hygiene assessment, quality of life.

1. Bataev, A. V., 2015. Analysis of the Russian market for distance education. Young scientist, 21, pp. 350–353. (In Russ.)
2. Bogatyrev, V. A., 2016. Information systems and technologies. Reliability theory: a textbook for undergraduate and graduate programs. Moscow: Yurayt Publ., 318 p. (In Russ.)
3. Veselitsky, O., Khabarov, D., 2019. Trends in the development of distance education in Russia and abroad. Colloquium-journal. Holopristansky regional center of employment, 3-3 (27), pp. 18–20. DOI: 10.24411/2520-6990-2019-10016 (In Russ.)
4. Gladkikh, Yu. P., Reshetnyak, E. A., 2017. Prospects and problems of the development of distance learning in Russia. Prospects for the development of information technologies: collection of materials of the XXXV International Scientific and Practical Conference (March 10, April 6, 2017). Novosibirsk: TsRNS Publ., pp. 113–119 (In Russ.)
5. Grunt, E. V., Belyaeva, E. A., Lissitsa, S., 2020. Distance education in a pandemic: new challenges to Russian higher education. Perspectives of Science & Education, 5 (47), pp. 48–58. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2020.5.3 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Dreval, M., 2020. Research of the Russian market of online education and educational technologies [online]. Available at: http://2017.russianinternetforum.ru/news/1290 (accessed 15.03.2021) (In Russ.)
7. Isakova, E. V., 2011. Working with a computer and computer visual syndrome. Vyatka medical bulletin, 3-4, pp. 32–35. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Krivorotov, S. K., 2020. Impact of distance learning on the physical activity of students during the 2020 pandemic. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 4 (141), pp. 173–177. DOI: 10.34772/KPJ.2020.141.4.024 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Krylova, N. P., Tyulyu, G. M., Levashov, E. N., 2020. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the integration of traditional and distance education in the university. Science for Education Today, 6 (10), pp. 200–219. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Milko, M. M., Guremina, N. V., 2020. Research of physical activity of students in conditions of distance learning and self-isolation. Modern science-intensive technologies, 5, pp. 195–200. (In Russ.)
11. Oborin, M. S., 2020. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the educational process. Service in Russia and abroad, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 153–163. DOI: 10.24411/1995-042X-2020-10514. (In Russ.)
12. Pililyan, N. Yu., 2020. Analysis of the use of modern educational technologies in an educational institution working in a distance mode. Questions of pedagogy, 6-2, pp. 195–198. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Ruslyakova, E. E., Golub, A. A., Kiseleva, U. P., 2020. Features of neuropsychic stress in modern students in conditions of forced self-isolation. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 3 (8) [online]. Available at: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/31PSMN320.pdf (accessed 15.03.2021). (in Russ.)
14. Suktalieva, E. V., 2011. Management of health-preserving educational process at school. Successes of modern natural science, 5, pp. 94–96. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Horoshavin, A. A., Abramyan, G. V., 2015. Problems and difficulties of software and hardware support for e-learning in a pedagogical university. Information and telecommunication systems and technologies: collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. St. Petersburg, pp. 88–91. (In Russ.)
16. Chistyakova, R. M., 2020. On some problems in the organization of distance learning for children with profound visual impairments. Actual problems of teaching methods of computer science and mathematics in modern school. Moscow, pp. 658–661. (In Russ.)
17. Shisharina, N. V., Podlinyaev, O. L., Romm, T. A., 2020. Cross-cultural analysis of hygienic expertise strategies in education. Problems of social hygiene, health care and the history of medicine, 28 (special issue), pp. 840-850. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2020-28-s1-840-850 (In Russ.)
18. Shisharina, N. V., Romm, T. A., Inozemtsev, P. O., Podlinyayev, O. L., 2020. Hygienic assessment as a factor of education efficiency. Siberian pedagogical journal, 4, pp. 126–133. DOI: 10.15293/1813-4718.2004.13 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
19. Shisharina, N. V., Romm, T. A., 2020. Models of approbation of strategies for hygienic assessment of innovative pedagogical technologies in education. Izvestiya Voronezh State Pedagogical University, 3, pp. 10–16. DOI: 10.47438/2309-7078_2020_3_10 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
20. Velavan, T. P., Meyer, C. G., 2020. The COVID-19 epidemic. Trop Med IntHealth, 25 (3), pp. 278–280. DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13383 (In Eng)