Pedagogical Foundations of Creating a Digital Service for Future Substitute Parents
1. Boenkina, E. A., 2017. Determination of motivation among candidates for substitute parents as prevention of secondary orphanhood // Modern science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series: Cognition, no. 5-6, pp. 32–37. (In Russ.)
2. Galaguzova, Yu. N., Mazurchuk, N. I., 2020. The substitute family as a psychological and pedagogical phenomenon: structural and functional features and typical difficulties. Psychology. Psychophysiology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 62–63. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zameschayuschaya-semya-kak-psihologo-p... (accessed 05.11.2021). (In Russ.).
3. Zhulego, V. G., Balyakin, A. A., Nurbina, N. V., and others, 2019. Digitalization of society: New challenges in the social sphere. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law, no. 9-2, pp. 36–43. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Zakharova, Zh. A., 2006. Problems of orphans brought up in substitute families. Bulletin of the N. A. Nekrasov KSU, no. 8 [online]. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-detey-sirot-vospityvayuschihs... (accessed 12.12.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Lavrentieva, Z. I., 2017. The return of children from substitute families as a socio-pedagogical phenomenon. News of Saratov University. A new series. Acmeology of Education series. Psychology of development, Iss. 3 (23), pp. 178–183. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Osipov, G. V., Klimovitsky, S. V., 2010. Digitalization of public life and new tasks of social sciences [online]. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovizatsiya-obschestvennoy-zhizni-... (accessed 14.12.2021). (In Russ.)
7. Romanova, N. V., 2020. Digitalization of social services: problems and prospects. USNTU Bulletin. Science, education, Economics, no. 1 (31), pp. 58–65. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Skalaban, I. A., 2015. In search of solidarity. Public participation in the mirror of the theory of social capital. Herald of NGUEU, no. 1, pp. 304–315. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Chernov, I. B., 2021. Digitalization as a trend in the development of modern society: the specifics of scientific discourse. Humanities of the South of Russia, vol. 10 (47), no. 1, pp. 121–131. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Bourdieu, P., 1985. The Forms of Capital. John Richardson, ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. N. Y. (In Eng.)
11. Cenamor, J., Sjödin, D. R., Parida, V., 2017. Adopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization. International Journal of Production Economics, no. 192, pp. 54–65. (In Eng.)
12. Collins, R., 2020. Social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity. American j. of cultural sociology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 477–497. (In Eng.)
13. Drexl, J., 2017. Economic Efficiency versus Democracy: On the Potential Role of Competition Policy in Regulating Digital Markets in Times of Post-Truth Politics. Competition Policy: Between Equity and Efficiency (eds. Gerard D., Lianos I.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (In Eng.).
14. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., 2011. Report. Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute. May [online]. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insight... (дата обращения: 02.12.2021). (In Eng.)
15. Lavrentieva, Z. I., Leonova, E. E., 2020. Returns of adolescents from adoptive families: problems and pedagogical solutions. Shirin, A. G., ed. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, рр. 389–395. (In Eng.)
16. Archard, P., Laird, S. E., Clawson, R., Morris, K., 2017. Family experiences of children’s social care involvement following a social work change programme. Journal of Social Work Practice, no. 32(3), pp. 237–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2017.1326473 (In Eng.)
17. Solove, D. J., 2006. The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. New York: NYU Press (In Eng.)