DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2201.04
UDC: 
13+37(09)Газман О. С.
Pivchenko Vladimir Petrovich
Кандидат педагогических наук, Associate Professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology of the Institute of History, Humanitarian and Social Education, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, vladimirpivchenko@yandex.ru, Novosibirsk
Shabanov Artyom G.
Кандидат педагогических наук, Assist. Prof. of the Department of Pedagogics and Psychology, Institute of History, Humanitarian and Social Education, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, shabanov_11.01.84@mail.ru, Novosibirsk

Freedom of Capacity as an Integral Pedagogical Value in the Pedagogical Heritage of O. S. Gazman

Abstract: 
The article is devoted to comprehending such important categories for modern pedagogy as freedom in the space of upbringing, the formation of a free personality from the standpoint of a humanistic approach to the personality of a pupil. The main attention is paid to the pedagogical heritage of O. S. Gazman, his pedagogical ideas and scientific and theoretical generalizations. The pedagogical legacy of O. S. Gazman is perceived today not only in the context of the pedagogically important judgments he proposes, methodological generalizations expressed in the era of perestroika. From the standpoint of pedagogy of the XXI century, the organization of modern Russian education, the ideas expressed by O. S. Gazman appear as an innovative philosophical and pedagogical concept, in which the main concepts are freedom, self-education of the individual, and pedagogical support. At the same time, in our opinion, work on the most important ideas of O. S. Gazman today in domestic pedagogy is insufficient. To a greater extent, perhaps, his idea of pedagogical support is being comprehended and used, which today has acquired some methodological features and is being implemented in many educational institutions, primarily thanks to his students and followers, N. N. Mikhailova and S. M. Yusfin. O. S. Gazman’s judgments regarding freedom as the core of the formation of a modern personality, capable of making his own choice, realizing his various life strategies and scenarios, correlating with his moral attitudes and ready to fully bear responsibility for this choice – of course, are insufficiently commented and far from are fully included in the theory and practice of modern pedagogy. However, there is no doubt that such innovative ideas rightfully puts O. S. Gazman on a par with outstanding domestic thinkers, such as, for example, S. I. Gessen practice. The purpose of the article is to analyze the most significant scientific provisions stated by O. S. Gazman and concerning the essence of freedom and the resources of its formation among pupils. Basic research methods: analysis of scientific and methodological literature, comparative analysis of theoretical and pedagogical concepts; theoretical generalizations. Research results: it was concluded that, firstly, O. S. Gazman firmly established freedom as an integral category, new for its time, understood as the integrity of the personality core of a developing person; secondly, the ideas of O. S. Gazman and his assumptions regarding the implementation of the principle of free-spirited upbringing, which he managed to implement in his pedagogical activity, today finally acquire the features of practical comprehension and application.
Keywords: 
freedom in the space of upbringing, pedagogical support, freedom of capacity, the principle of freedom of conformity, self-education of the individual, pedagogical support
Please register
References: 

1. Abramova, V. V., 2020. The essence of the concept of subject-professional activity in the context of the educational activity of a teacher. Fundamental problems of education in the context of modern social processes: materials of the international scientific and practical conference. Novosibirsk, pp. 330–335. (In Russ.).
2. Alexandrova, E. A., 2008. Creating a system of educational work at school. National education, no. 9, pp. 227–235. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Gazman, O. S., 2002. Non-classical education: From authoritarian pedagogy to pedagogy of freedom. Moscow: MIROS Publ., 296 p. (In Russ.).
4. Gessen, S. I., 1995. Foundations of pedagogy. Introduction to applied philosophy. Moscow: School-Press Publ., 448 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kiselev, N. N., Anikeeva, N. P., 2020. Information-wave processes in education. Fundamental problems of education in the context of modern social processes: materials of the international scientific and practical conference. Novosibirsk,
pp. 92–97. (In Russ.).
6. Krylova, N., 2002. In search of a new science. Gazman O. S. Non-classical education: From authoritarian pedagogy to pedagogy of freedom. Moscow: MIROS Publ., pp. 284–287. (In Russ.).
7. Larionova, I. A., 2014. Situation of success in the development of relations of cooperation between teacher and students. Pedagogical education in Russia, no. 9, pp. 198–206. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
8. Lobyntseva, S. V., Mikhailova, N. N., Yusfin, S. M., 2019. Development of self-organization of the child-adult community in additional education Social pedagogy in Russia. Scientific and methodical journal, no. 4, pp. 32–39. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
9. Mikhailova, N. N., 2018. Technology of pedagogical support in the development of upbringing of schoolchildren. Scientific research of problems of childhood, upbringing, socialization: actual aspects, theoretical and methodological foundations. Moscow, pp. 30–32. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
10. Pivchenko, V. P., 2016. Pedagogical support as the basis of the professional position of the educator in working with the children’s collective. Social partnership: pedagogical support of the subjects of education: materials of the IV International scientific and practical conference, editorial board: N. N. Mikhailova et al. Moscow, pp. 79–85. (In Russ.).
11. Pivchenko, V. P., 2019. Personality-oriented pedagogy of A. S. Makarenko in the memoirs of his pupils. Siberian pedagogical journal, no. 2, pp. 102–112. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
12. Approximate education program. 2019. Moscow, 36 p. (In Russ.).
13. Romm, T. A., 2021. Scientific and methodological support for the implementation of the education program. Education as a strategic national priority. International Scientific and Educational Forum. Yekaterinburg, pp. 39–42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
14. Romm, T. A., 2017. Horizons and boundaries of education. Domestic and foreign pedagogy, T. 2, no. 1 (36), pp. 75–82. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
15. Chesnokova, G. S., Odinokova, N. A., 2021. Modern directions of psychological and pedagogical support of childhood. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no. 2, pp. 124–127. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
16. Shabanov, A. G., 2021. Psychological and pedagogical support of social success of adolescents at school. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no. 4, pp. 34–42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
17. Shabanov, A. G., 2021. Pedagogical conditions for the formation of motivation of sports activity in a children’s dance group. Bulletin of pedagogical innovations, no. 4 (64), pp. 60–65. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
18. Yusfin, S. M., 2016. Contract as a mechanism for achieving and developing trust. Portal of trust. Collection of scientific papers. Ulyanovsk, pp. 93–99. (In Russ.).
19. Postman, N., 1982. The Disappearance of Childhood. N. Y.: Delacorte Press Publ., 177 p. (In Eng.).
20. Ruys, K., Stapel, D., 2008. The Secret Life of Emotions. Psychological Science, vol. 19, pp. 385–391. (In Eng.).