DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2201.06
UDC: 
378.14
Golubchikova Marina Gennadievna
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Pedagogy, Irkutsk State University, Associate Professor of the Department of Pedagogical and Information Technologies, Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education – Branch Campus of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, mg2@bk.ru, Irkutsk

Pedagogical act as a means of manifestation and formation of moral and value independence of future teachers

Abstract: 
The article presents the author’s view on the importance of a pedagogical act for the formation of correct moral behavior in the process of training future teachers and in professional activity. The term “morally valuable independence” is considered as a characteristic of the result of upbringing and self-education of future teachers. A method of forming moral and value independence through preparation for a pedagogical act through case technology is proposed. The purpose of the article is to reveal the possibilities of pedagogical action as a means of manifestation and formation of moral and value independence of students – future teachers. Methodology and methods of research: the methodological basis of the research is a competence-based approach to pedagogical education; in the process of research, theoretical methods were used – analysis of scientific sources; logical – analysis, synthesis, systematization, generalization; diagnostic – questionnaires, testing; methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis of the results obtained. Research results, discussion. As the study showed, by the end of the experiment, a considerable part of the students showed the ability to creatively, non-standard analysis of pedagogical situations based on moral values, which indicates readiness for pedagogical action. Thus, in the process of solving pedagogical tasks aimed at the formation of readiness for action, there is a formation of moral and value independence of future teachers Conclusion. Preparation for the performance of a pedagogical act on the basis of case technology allows solving a number of tasks relevant for the development of moral qualities: maximally activate each student, involve him in the process of analyzing the pedagogical situation and making the right decision; promote the effective application of theoretical knowledge in pedagogical activity to predict possible consequences. This is facilitated by the use of developed orientation schemes in the learning process, which are a support for students in working with pedagogical situations.
Keywords: 
act, pedagogical act, independence, educational independence, moral and value independence, case technology, analysis of specific situations
Please register
References: 

1. Bakeeva, E. V., 2019. “The horror of concreteness”: to the philosophy of the act of M. K. Mamardashvili. Bulletin of the Humanities University, no. 4, pp. 162–168. (In Russ.)
2. Beizerov, V. A., 2015. 105 Cases on pedagogy. Pedagogical tasks and situations. Moscow: Flint Publ., 100 p. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Bizyaeva, A. A., 2004. Psychology of a thinking teacher: pedagogical reflection. Pskov: S. M. Kirov State Pedagogical Institute Publ., 216 p. (In Russ.)
4. Golubchikova, M. G., Kharchenko, S. A., 2007. Case technologies in teacher training. Textbook. Irkutsk: Publishing house of the State Educational Institution of Higher Education “IGPU”, 116 p. (In Russ.)
5. Dzhishkariani, T. D., 2020. Problems of formation of professional competence among future teachers in the implementation of spiritual and moral education in the conditions of distance learning. Science and education in a modern university: vector of development: materials of scientific and practical conf. (Shuya, May 13). Shuya, pp. 40–44. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Dmitriev, D. V., 2003. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language edited by D. V. Dmitriev. Moscow: Astrel Publ., AST Publ., 1578 p. (In Russ.)
7. Efremova, T. F., 2006. Modern explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: In 3 vols. Moscow: AST Publ., vol. 3, 976 p. (In Russ.)
8. Karandashev, V. N., 2004. Methodology of Sh. Schwartz for the study of personality values: concept and methodological guidance. St. Petersburg: Speech Publ., 72 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kolomiets, O. M., 2016. Organization of student’s educational and professional activity in teaching on the basis of competence-activity approach. Pedagogical Journal of Bashkortostan, no. 5, p. 47. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Krylova, V. V., 2015. Formation of readiness for pedagogical action in the conditions of network interaction. Modernization of pedagogical education in the context of the global educational agenda: collection of All-Russian scientific and practical conf. (Nizhny Novgorod, November 10, 2015). Nizhny Novgorod, pp. 160–162. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Krylova, V. V., 2014. The value and meaning of a pedagogical act. European Journal of Modern Education, no. 3, pp. 168–174. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Mamardashvili, M. K., 1996. The necessity of self. Introduction to philosophy. Moscow: Labyrinth Publ., 154 p. (In Russ.)
13. Ozhegov, S. I., Shvedova, N. Yu., 2004. Explanatory dictionary. Moscow: Onyx XIX century Publ., 1198 p. (In Russ.)
14. On national goals and strategic objectives of the development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2024 Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated May 7, 2018 No. 204 [online]. – URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201805070038 (аccessed 04.11.2021) (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Skomarokhov, A. V., 2019. Deed and symphony. Tula: Humanities Bulletin of the L. N. Tolstoy TSPU, no. 3, pp. 174–181. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. Ushakova, V. S., Golubchikova, M. G., 2020. Deed: comparative analysis. Education in the XXI century: materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, February 28–29, 2020). Moscow: Publishing House “Development of Education”, pp. 297–303.
17.Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., Jones, R., 2018. Independent learning – what we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education. Critical Perspectives, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 145–161.
18. Meyer, B., Haywood, N., Sachdev, D., Faraday, S. What is independent learning and what are the benefits for students? London: Department for Children, Schools and Families Research Report 051, 2008.