DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2206.02
UDC: 
371
Lurye Arman Zhenisovich
Academician KazNAEN, Director, School of Personal Development, ., zoyasyst@mail.ru, Almaty, Kazakhstan

A Model of the Centrifugal Pedagogical Process in a Digital Environment

Abstract: 
The leading place in the pedagogical science of Russia and the CIS countries has long been occupied by the idea of reviving the humanistic tradition, but the educational process in schools of different types still follows traditional authoritarian technology, as it did many years ago, and digitalization is manifested by low-quality video tutorials, fictitious electronic magazine, etc. According to the authors, digitalization contributes to increased comfort due to gamification, the possibility of repetition and consolidation with the use of games, simulators. But foreign studies are now increasingly focusing on the consequences and risks of digitalization for humans. Due to the influence of the Internet and digital technologies on the education of students, the need to change the models of education and upbringing with the development of the readiness of teachers and students to interact in a digital environment is actualized. Goal. To develop a model of a system of centrifugal pedagogical process based on a personality-centered approach in education, when the source of development is the student himself, with the harmonization of psychological and pedagogical support for the process of formation of creative self-realization of the individual in a digital environment. Methodology and methods of research. For comparative analysis, the author has chosen a model of the system of the traditional educational process (according to P. I. Pidkasistom). The study was conducted on the basis of the personality-centered approach of K. Rogers, the concept of social education in the process of socialization (I. P. Ivanov, A. V. Mudrik, T. A. Romm), a systematic, synergetic approach (L. I. Novikova), methods of analysis, establishment of causal relationships, processing of bibliographic sources, experimental work. In conclusion, it is concluded that: in traditional schools, it is possible to transfer education and upbringing to a centrifugal systematic pedagogical technology of teaching and upbringing within the framework of compliance with the requirements of state educational standards with the implementation of individual activities on their own motivation; many methods that provide a stable educational effect, as a unique method of collective creative activity of I. P. Ivanov, today proved to be particularly relevant for the educational activity of the teacher.
Keywords: 
personality-centered approach in education; digitalization; centrifugal pedagogical process; systematic method of cognition; facilitation
Please register
References: 

1. Azbel, A. A., Ilyushin, L. S., Kazakova, E. I., Morozova, P. A., 2022. The attitude of students and teachers to feedback: contradictions and development trends. Education and science, no. 24 (7), pp. 76–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-7-76-109 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Arkhangelsk, S. I., 1976. Lectures on the scientific organization of the educational process in higher school. Moscow: Higher School Publ., 200 p. (In Russ.).
3. Bardin, K. V., 1988. So that the child learns successfully. Moscow: Pedagogy Publ., 176 p. (In Russ.).
4. Basharin, V. F., 1993. Pedagogical technology: What is it? Specialist, no. 9, pp. 25–27. (In Russ.).
5. Blinov, V. I., 2019. Digital didactics: a fashion trend or a new science? Professional education. Capital, no. 3, 28 p. (In Russ.).
6. Verbitsky, A. A., 2019. Digital learning: problems, risks and prospects. Electronic scientific journal “Homo Cyberus”, no. 1 (6) [online]. Available at: http://journal.homocyberus.ru/Verbitskiy_ AA_1_2019 (accessed: 12.10.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Gordeeva, T. O., Sychev, O. A., Sidneva, A. N., 2021. Evaluation of achievements of schoolchildren in traditional and developing learning systems: psychological and pedagogical analysis. Education issues, no. 1, pp. 213–236. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-213-236 (In Russ.).
8. Gushchin, A. N., 2022. Digital didactics: systemic foundations and the image of the future. Pedagogy and enlightenment, no. 2, pp. 100–115. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0676.2022.2.35657 (In Russ.).
9. Dakhin, A. N., 2003. Pedagogical modeling: essence, effectiveness and... uncertainty. Pedagogy, no. 4, pp. 21–26. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Ivanov, I. P., 1989. Encyclopedia of collective creative affairs. Moscow: Pedagogy Publ., 206 p. (In Russ.).
11. Kagan, V. M., 1986. Abstract-scheme in the optimization of training in special technical disciplines. Irkutsk: Publishing house Irkut. un-ta, 125 p. (In Russ.)
12. Kazin, F. A., Lukyanova, N. G., 2022. School today and tomorrow through the eyes of high school students. Education issues, no. 2, pp. 155–189. (In Russ.).
13. Lavrentiev, G. V., Lavrentieva, N. B., Neudakhina, N. A., 2002. Innovative teaching technologies in professional training of specialists. Ch. 2. Barnaul: Publishing House Alt. un-ta, 232 p. (In Russ.).
14. Lurie, A. Zh., 2022. System method optimizing the self-esteem of a teenager’s personality. Yekaterinburg International Scientific Research Journal, no. 6 (120), part 4, pp. 55–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2022.120.6.143 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Mudrik, A. V., 2000. Social pedagogy: Studies for students of pedagogical universities / Edited by V. A. Slastenin. 3rd ed., ispr. and add. Moscow: Publishing Center “Academy”, 200 p. (In Russ.)
16. Nikulina, T. V., Starichenko, E. B., 2018. Informatization and digitalization of education: concepts, technologies, management. Pedagogical education in Russia, no. 8, pp. 107–113. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
17. Novikova, L. I., 1974. To the study of pedagogical problems of the collective. Problems of the theory of education. Part1 / Edited by L. P. Bueva, L. I. Novikova, G. N. Filonov. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., pp. 135–150. (In Russ.)
18. Pidkasistiy, P. I., ed., 2011. Pedagogy: studies. manual, 2nd ed., ispr. and add. Moscow: Yurayt Publ., 502 p.
19. Practical psychology for teachers. Moscow: Under the guidance of academician M. K. Tutushkina. Moscow: Filin Information and Publishing House, 1997, 328 p. (In Russ.)
20. Rogers, K. R., 1993. Client-centered psychotherapy. Moscow: Refl-book Publ., 320 p. (In Russ.)
21. Rogers, K., Freinberg, D., 2002. Freedom to learn. Moscow, 292 p. (In Russ.)
22. Romm, T. A., 2014. Theory of education in a changing society. Parenting issues, no. 1, pp. 57–65. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
23. Romm, T. A., 2021. Education in the digital age. Izvestiya Saratov University. A new series. Acmeology of Education series. Psychology of development, vol. 10, vol. 4, pp. 360–366. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-4-360-366 (In Russ.).
24. Slastenin, V. A., Isaev, I. F., Shiyanov, E. N., 2002. General pedagogy: Textbook for students. higher. schools, institutions / Edited by V. A. Slastenin In 2 hours. Moscow: Humanit. ed. center VLADOS, Part 1, 288 p. (In Russ.).
25. Tukina, L. V., Khazova, S. A., 2016. Difficult life situations through the eyes of high school students. Psychology of stress and coping behavior: resources, health, development: materials of the IV International Scientific Conference, vol. 1, pp. 395–398.
26. Goal-setting in the educational process of the Humanities University: A collective monograph / Author’s collective. Nizhnevartovsk: Publishing house Nizhnevart. humanit. un-ta, 2010, 191 p. (In Russ.).