DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2402.03
UDC: 
37.01
Madzhuga Anatoly Gennadievich
Доктор педагогических наук, Dr. Sci. (Pedag.), Prof., Head of the Department of Pedagogy, Psychology and Health Care, Institute of Education Development of the Republic of Bashkortostan, madzhuga.anatolij@inbox.ru, Ufa
Polikarpova Elena V.
Доктор философских наук, Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Southern Federal University, evpolikarpova@sfedu.ru, Rostov-on-Don
Gadaborsheva Zarina I.
Кандидат психологических наук, Cand. Sci. (Psychol.), Assoc. Prof., Head of the Department of Preschool Psychology and Pedagogy, Chechen State Pedagogical University, zgadaborsheva@mail.ru, Grozny
Dzhegistaeva Larisa I.
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Pedagogy and Preschool Psychology, Chechen State Pedagogical University, li_dzhegistaeva@mail.ru, Grozny
Dashkueva Petimat V.
Кандидат педагогических наук, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Primary Education Methodology, Chechen State Pedagogical University, pv-dashkueva@mail.ru, Grozny

Features of the Formation of Fractal-Holographic Thinking of Students: Perceptual Challenges of the Digital

Abstract: 
Introduction. The article examines the features of the formation of fractal-holographic thinking of students in the system of modern education, starting from kindergarten and ending with university, in the context of the methodology of transdisciplinary research, organically linked to the synergetic paradigm, the key point of which is the fractal approach. The purpose of the article is to consider the essence of fractal-holographic thinking of students and the features of its formation in the context of the perceptual challenges of the digital age. Methodology and methods of research. The methodological basis of the research is fractal and transdisciplinary approaches that allow us to consider the process of formation of fractal-holographic thinking of students, emphasizing the perceptual challenges of the digital era in the context of the interaction of trends in aestheticization and technologization. Building the scientific concept of “fractal-holographic thinking of students”, philosophical statements about man as a bio-psycho-socio-cultural-existential phenomenon are taken into account. The results of the study. For the first time, the authors explore the fractal-holographic thinking of man from the perspective of such fundamental concepts as the concept of “beauty of fractals”, expressing the laws of harmony of nature, the concept of T.V. Chernihovskaya “The universe is a work of Baroque art”, as well as the archetypes of the unconscious Jung. Special attention is paid to the mechanisms of formation of fractal-holographic thinking of students, which functions in the context of an aestheticized and technologized world. The content of the study describes fundamentally new approaches regarding the phenomenology of “perceptual challenge”, which make it possible to effectively form fractal-holographic thinking of students in the era of digitalization. For the first time, an attempt has been made to classify and describe the perceptual challenges underlying the formation of fractal-holographic thinking of students of the third millennium in the context of the interaction of aestheticization and technologization trends. Conclusion. When explaining the essence of fractal-holographic thinking, its relationship with holographic and synergetic thinking is shown, the role of fractal-holographic thinking in the hierarchy of human thinking types is determined, and the emphasis is on the importance of art, which among human activities has the highest degree of creativity.
Keywords: 
transdisciplinary methodology; holonomic approach; post-non-classical paradigm; post-non-classical education; fractal approach; holonomic mode of consciousness; thinking; multidimensional thinking; fractal-holographic thinking; perceptual challenge; principles of formation of fractal-holographic thinking; digital generation; art
Please register
References: 

1. Baryshev, Yu., Teericorpi, P., 2005. Fractal structure of the Universe. An essay on the development of cosmology. Nizhny Arkhyz: Publishing house of the SAO RAS, 396 p. (In Russ.)
2. Haitun, S. D., 2007. From the ergodic hypothesis to the fractal picture of the world. Moscow: Komkniga Publ., 251 p. (In Russ.)
3. Holographic model and psychology [online]. Available at: http://www.poliinform.ru (accessed: 12.08.2023). (In Russ.)
4. Dontsov, G. A., Melnikov, G. S., Serov, I. N., 2003. Fractal concept of deterministic chaos. Scientific periodical “Philosophy of Science”, no. 3, pp. 35–52 [online]. Available at: http://www.philosophy (accessed 29.08.2023). (In Russ.)
5. Prigozhin, I. R., 1986. Order from chaos: A new dialogue of man with nature / trans. from English; under the general editorship of V. I. Arshinov, Yu. L. Klimontovich, Yu. V. Sachkov. Moscow: Progress Publ., 471 p. (In Russ.)
6. Voitsekhovich, V. E. Fractals and attractors of social evolution [online]. Available at: http://www.inauka.ru/ (accessed 30.06.2023). (In Russ.)
7. Gapontseva, M. G., Fedorov, V. A., Gapontsev, V. L., 2009. The concept of fractal geometry as objects of pedagogy and the theory of scientific cognition. Education and Science, no. 4 (61), pp. 6–22. (In Russ.)
8. Bogatykh, B. A., 2018. Fractal-holographic сonstruct and K. Levin’s field theory. National Psychological Journal, no. 2 (30), pp. 123–134. DOI: 10.11621/npj.2018.0213 (In Russ.)
9. Kiyashchenko, L. P., 2009. Philosophy of transdisciplinarity. Moscow: IFRAN Publ., 205 p. (In Russ.)
10. Polikarpova, E. V., 2011. Modern ICT and the “psychocosmos” of a person. Taganrog: Publishing House of TTI SFU, 218 p. (In Russ.)
11. Arshinov, V. I., 1999. Synergetics as a phenomenon of post-non-classical science. Moscow: IFRAN, 203 p. (In Russ.)
12. Madzhuga, A. G., Sinitsina, I. A., 2015. Fractal pedagogy: ontological meanings and methodological possibilities: monograph. Sterlitamak: SF Bashgu, 389 p. (In Russ.)
13. Martynovich, K. A., 2011. Nonlinear-dynamic picture of the world: ontological meanings and methodological possibilities. Abstract Cand.Sci. (Philos.) Saratov, 19 p. (In Russ.)
14. Miller, D. Holistic education. Pedagogy of premonition [online]. Available at: http://ps.1september.ru/articlef. php?ID=200205007 (accessed: 05.08.2023). (In Russ.)
15. Subetto, A. I. Priorities and philosophy of goal-setting of fundamental science in the XXI century. Transformation of the paradigm of university education [online]. Available at: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/ (accessed: 15.03.2023). (In Russ.)
16. Jurgens, H., Paitgen, H.-O., Zaupe, D., 1990. The language of fractals in the world of science. Scientific American, no. 10, pp. 36–44. (In Russ.)
17. Mandelbrot, B. B., 1982. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Sun-Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company Publ., 470 р. (In Eng.)
18. Knyazeva, E. N., Kurdyumov, S. P., 2005. The foundations of synergetics: synergetic worldview. Moscow: KomKniga Publ., 265 p. (In Russ.)
19. Coleman, P. H., Pietronero, L., 1992. The fractal structure of the Universe. Phys. Repts, vol. 213, no. 6, pp. 311–389. (In Eng.)
20. Eckmann‚ J.-P.‚ Ruelle‚ D., 1985. Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 57‚ no. 3, pp. 617–656. (In Eng.)
21. Moon, F. C., 1992. Chaotic and Fractal Dynamics. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 408 p. (In Eng.)
22. Tikhomirov, O. K., 1984. Psychology of thinking. Moscow: MSU Publ., 270 p. (In Russ.)
23. Polikarpov, V. S., 1990. Science and mysticism in the XX century. Moscow: Mysl Publ., 219 p. (In Russ.)
24. Volkov, Yu. G., Polikarpov, V. S., 1993. Integral human nature: natural science and humanitarian aspects. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House of the Rostov State University, 288 p. (In Russ.)
25. Bransky, V. P., 1999. Art and Philosophy. The role of philosophy in the formation and perception of a work of art on the example of the history of painting. Kaliningrad: Yantarniy Skaz, 704 p. (In Russ.)
26. Paitgen, H.-O., Richter, P. H., 1993. The beauty of fractals. Images of complex dynamical systems. Moscow: Mir Publ., 176 p. (In Russ.)
27. Chernigovskaya, T. V., 2020. Neuroscience in search of meanings: brain as baroque? Voprosy Philosophii, no. 1, pp. 17–26. (In Russ.)
28. Umberto Eco, ed., 2005. A History of Beauty. Moscow: WORD / SLOVO Publ., 440 p. (In Russ.)
29. Kulka, I., 2019. Psychology of art. H.: Publishing House “Humanitarian Center”, 556 p. (In Russ.)
30. Ho, Daechang, 2022. Technology is changing the face of a work of art. Koreana, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 18–23. (In Russ.)
31. Zinchenko, V. P., 1997. Staff of Osip Mandelstam and Pipe of Mamardashvili. To the beginnings of organic psychology. Moscow: Novaya Shkola Publ., 336 p. (In Russ.)
32. Bird, M., 2013. 100 ideas that changed art. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 216 p. (In Russ.)
33. Slade Toby, 2021. Decolonization of luxury fashion in Japan. Fashion Theory. Cloth. Body. Culture, pp. 63–90. (In Russ.)
34. Pictures that changed the world. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 2018, 320 p. (In Russ.)
35. Zhang Qiqun, 2016. Chinese aesthetics of the XX century. Moscow: International publishing company “Chance”, 300 p. (In Russ.)
36. Japanese art. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 2011, 192 p. (In Russ.)
37. Stalker, N., 2021. Japan. History and culture: from samurai to manga. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction Publ., 584 p. (In Russ.)
38. Postrigay, A., 2021. Great Art for Children: from Baroque to Van Gogh. Moscow: AST Publ., 208 p. (In Russ.)
39. Gomperz, U., 2021. Think like an artist, or how to make life more creative without cutting off your ear. Moscow: Sinbad Publ., 256 p. (In Russ.)
40. Belkin, A. S., Zhukova, N. K., 1999. Vitagenic education: A holographic approach. Yekaterinburg, 135 p. (In Russ.)
41. Getmanov, I. P., 2005. Principles of coevolution: Abstract Dr. Sci. (Philos). Rostov on Don, 52 p. (In Russ.)
42. Jung, K. G., 1997. Investigation of the phenomenology of the self / trans. from English, lat. Moscow: Refl-buk Publ.; Kiev: Vakler Publ., 336 p. (In Russ.)
43. Zhukova, O. I., 2009. The concept of the self in the system of philosophical ideas about a person. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Series “Philosophy”, no. 1 (1), pp. 139–151. (In Russ.)
44. Campbell, J., 2019. Masks of God. Primal mythology. Moscow: Castalia Publ., 236 p. (In Russ.)
45. Molchanov, N. V., 2021. A person who buys and sells: how the laws of evolution affect the psychology of the consumer and what does Luke Skywalker have to do with it. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 400 p. (In Russ.)
46. Budanov, V. G., 2007. Methodology of synergetics in post-non-classical science and in education. Moscow: LKI publishing house, 232 p. (In Russ.)