DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2603.09
UDC: 
378.2
Blinov Leonid V.
Доктор педагогических наук, Professor of the Higher School of Theory and Methodology of Pedagogical and Defectological Education, Pacific National University, astrax@list.ru, Khabarovsk
Prokopova Anna S.
Senior Lecturer of the Department of Decorative and Applied Arts and Design, Kuban State University, pannaDVGGU@mail.ru, Krasnodar

The Role of a Higher Education Teacher in Personalized Learning for Future Art Teachers

Abstract: 
This article provides an analysis of the role of a higher education teacher in personalized university education for future visual arts teachers based on theoretical and methodological research. A professional artist, including an artist-teacher, has always been perceived as a unique individual with creative potential, and therefore, the learning process itself requires a creative approach. Personalized education not only allows future visual arts teachers to recognize their own creative uniqueness, but also promotes the development of their ability to design their own activities and make independent decisions in non-standard situations. Research on personalization in the field of pedagogical sciences shows the importance of the personal and cultural-educational function of higher education. The teacher plays an important role in the personalized learning system. Their task is to identify the unique needs and potential of each student. The purpose of the article. The article provides a theoretical justification for the teacher’s role in the comprehensive development of the student’s personal potential in the history of education, as well as a definition of the direction of modern personalized artistic and pedagogical education, where the entire process revolves around the interaction between the teacher and the student. Methodology and research methods. The research methodology examines the concept of a teacher’s personality in different historical eras. Through the analysis and synthesis of theoretical research in the field of pedagogical sciences, the study identifies aspects of the teacher’s role in personalized learning for future art teachers. Results of the study. The article presents the results of a theoretical and practical study of the role of a higher education teacher in personalized education of future visual arts teachers. It provides an example of an effective technology for personalized education in the form of project activities. Projects that combine art, science, and technology are actively implemented at Kuban State University. These projects allow students to realize their practical, creative, and scientific potential during their educational process. Conclusion. In conclusion the article draws general conclusions that the content of the role of a higher education teacher in the context of personalized education includes a humanistic focus, a high level of competence, intelligence, and a creative approach to professional activity, with the student at the center of this content.
Keywords: 
higher education teacher; personalized education; fine arts teacher; educational process
References: 

1. Kassikhina, V. E., Novikova, S. S., 2012. Conditions and factors of development of national self-awareness in students. Education, Science and Psychology, no. 2 (21), pp. 30–33. (In Russ.)
2. Gluzman, N. A., Gorbunova, N. V., 2019. Teacher’s professionalism: success and career. Moscow: INFRA-M Publ., 314 p. (In Russ.)
3. Zapesotsky, A. S., 2005. Simulation of education or education of simulation. Higher education in Russia, no. 7, pp. 65–69. (In Russ.)
4. Mikryukov, V. Yu., 2011. A Short Course in Pedagogy. St. Petersburg: BHV-Petersburg, 240 p. (In Russ.)
5. Ushinsky, K. D., 1974. Selected pedagogical works. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., 584 p. (In Russ.)
6. Smirnova, N. B., 2013. The problem of pedagogical authority in the scientific research of V.V. Zinkovsky. Historical and pedagogical journal, no. 4, pp. 134–137. (In Russ.)
7. Abramova, L. A., Vereshchak, S. B., 2022. Analysis of the development of humanistic ideas in domestic pedagogy at the beginning of the twentieth century: collection of conference papers. Pedagogy, psychology, society: from theory to practice: materials of the V All-Russian scientific and practical conf. with international participation. Cheboksary, pp. 72–73. (In Russ.)
8. Slastenin, V. A., Isaev, I. F., Shiyanov, E. N., 2002. Pedagogy: a teaching aid for students of higher pedagogical educational institutions. Moscow: Academy Publ., 576 p. (In Russ.)
9. Grachev, V. V., 2007. Theoretical foundations of personalization of the educational process in higher education: abstract. dis. doctor of ped. sciences: 13.00.01. Moscow, 46 p. (In Russ.)
10. Barabanshchikov, A. V., 1981. Problems of pedagogical culture of university teachers: on the issue of the essence of pedagogical culture. Sov. Pedagogy, no. 1, pp. 71–77. (In Russ.)
11. Kuzmina, N. V., 1976. Problems of training and education of students at the university. St. Petersburg: Leningrad State University Publishing House, 111 p. (In Russ.)
12. Granovskaya, R., 2007. Psychological defense. St. Petersburg: Rech Publ., 474 p. (In Russ.)
13. Kurasheva, S. V., 2006. Formation of communicative competence of future teachers: abstract dis. candidate of ped. sciences: 13.00.08. Kemerovo, 24 p. (In Russ.)
14. Leontyev, A. A., 1996. Pedagogical communication: 2nd ed. Nalchik: El-f Publ., 95 p. (In Russ.)
15. Psychology dictionary 2nd ed., 1990 / Under the general editorship of A. V. Petrovsky, M. G. Yaroshevsky. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 494 p. (In Russ.)
16. Bondarevskaya, E. V., Kulnevich, S. V., 1999. Pedagogy: personality in humanistic theories and systems of education: teaching aid for students of secondary and higher pedagogical educational institutions. Rostov on Don: Teacher Publ., 560 p. (In Russ.)
17. Gazman, O. S., 2002. Non-classical education: from authoritarian pedagogy to pedagogy of freedom. Moscow: Miros Publ., 296 p. (In Russ.)
18. Mudrik, A. V., 2006. Human socialization. M.: Academy Publ., 304 p. (In Russ.)
19. Yakimanskaya, I. S., 1995. Development of technology for personality-oriented learning. Questions of Psychology, no. 2, pp. 31–42. (In Russ.)
20. Serikov, V. V., 1994. Personal approach in education: concept and technologies. Volgograd: Peremena Publ., 150 p. (In Russ.)
21. Polat, E. S., 2005. New pedagogical and information technologies in the education system: textbook. Moscow: Academy Publ., 272 p. (In Russ.)
22. Dewey, J., 2000. Democracy and Education [trans. from English]. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press Publ., 382 p. (In Russ., translation from Eng.)
23. Larmer, J., 2016. It’s a Project-Based World. Educational Leadership, vol. 73, issue 6, pр. 66–70. (In Eng.)