DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.1905.07
UDC: 
376.6
Leonova Elena Evgenevna
Assist. Prof., Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Institute of History, Humanities and Social Education, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, leonela24@mail.ru, Novosibirsk

Performance Criteria For The Organization Of Pedagogical Assistance To Minors, Left Without Parental Care, To Return The Situation Of Foster Families In A Social Institution

Abstract: 
This article is devoted to the identification of specific features and the definition of criteria for the effectiveness of the organization of pedagogical assistance to adolescents without parental care in the situation of return from a substitute family to a social institution. Scientifically justified, the following criteria: personality (restoring confidence in adults, the formation of resilience, the consolidation of social experience in a foster family); the interaction between the teenager and the teacher (the realization of the fact of the return, the emotional experience of return, the definition of resources of the return); reflexive-evaluative (the successful resolution of the case histories of teenagers returned from foster families). The results of experimental work on overcoming the consequences of return in a social institution are presented.
Keywords: 
teenagers, return of the child from the substituting family, pedagogical assistance, the substituting family, criteria of pedagogical assistance
Please register
References: 

1. Baranovskaya, L. A., Ignatovа, V. V., 2008. Facilitation as a pedagogical strategy. Siberian pedagogical journal, No. 14, pp. 44–52. (In Russ.)
2. Kapilina, M. V., Panusheva, T. D., 2015. Foster child: life path, help and support Moscow: Nikaia Publ., 432 p. (In Russ.)
3. Kotli, P., 2000. New adoptive parents: first experience. Novosibirsk: Date Publ., 115 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kurneshova, L. E., 2009. System of assistance to children returned after a failed family life, in an educational institution for orphans and children left without parental care. Methodical recommendations. Moscow: School book Publ., 320 p. (In Russ.)
5. Lavrentieva, Z. I., 2017. Trust in adults as an indicator of the effectiveness of the anthropological approach to the upbringing of children in foster families. Teacher in the system of modern anthropological knowledge. Materials of the XIII International scientific-practical conference. Stavropol: News Bureau, pp. 248–253. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Lavrentieva, Z. I., Leonova, E. E., 2018. Consolidation of the social experience gained in the replacement family as a condition of pedagogical assistance to teenagers in the situation of return. Bulletin of pedagogical innovations, No. 3 (51), pp. 58–65. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Makhnach, A. V., Laktionova, A. I., 2013. Personal and behavioral characteristics of adolescents as a factor in their vitality and social adaptation. Psychological journal, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 67–82. (In Russ.)
8. Rugaard, N., 2016. Children with attachment disorders. Moscow: Family for every child Publ., 328 p. (In Russ.)
9. Shustova, I. Y., 2012. Pedagogical support of the subjectivity of the student. News of Saratov University. New sir. Acmeology of education. Psychology of development, Vol. 1, Iss. 4, pp. 74–78. (In Russ.)
10. Morris, K., Siobhan, E., Clawson, P., 2018. Family experiences of children’s social care involvement following a social work change programme. Journal of Social Work Practice. Vol. 32, Iss. 3. pp. 237–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2017.1326473. (In Eng.)
11. Schofield, G., Beek, M., 2014. The Secure Base Model: Promoting Attachment and Resilience in Foster Care and Adoption. Coram: BAAT Publ., 94 p. (In Eng.)